weapon to a non-state actor or proxy of some sort, one that would detonate it at a
mutually-agreeable target as soon as possible. One of these countries may use a
shipping container or some other clandestine means, cooperating with a proxy, to carry
out an attack on a target, the deniable use of nuclear weapons.
Three factors must be considered when addressing the above scenario. The first is an
issue of trust and control. Non-state, militant proxies like the PCCTS, Knights Templar
would rely on patrons, a country, for support and training. But we have our own interests
as well and we hold them close. Furthermore, there is no central hierarchy in the PCCTS,
Knights Templar as we are the sum of autonomous and completely independent cells. It
is therefore not a monolithic, unified entity but an extremely distributed network. A
majority of cells are not yet advanced enough to competently handle a large operation
This of course assumes that a capable regime would ever hand over a nuke to us in the
first place. Proxies must be kept dependent; otherwise they cease to be proxies. We do
not share some deep bond of trust with any of these regimes. Handing over even a crude
nuclear device is anathema to a potential relationship and would destroy the dynamics by
which that country enforces its will as a patron. It would have provided an organisation
that it can never fully trust with the one true guarantor of sovereignty.
Second, the nuclear device is the product of an immense, expensive national effort. Each
individual weapon or device, especially early on, represents an enormous investment of
national resources. By handing one over to an outside group, the country not only has no
assurance of it being employed in the way they want, but opens itself to the prospect of
that immense investment being wasted or misused.
Finally, there is the issue of risk. A nuclear weapon used in a terrorist attack against any
of the cultural Marxist EUSSR regimes will be followed by the most intense, broad and
meticulous investigation in human history. The fissile material that made it possible will
be traced ruthlessly to its source. The necessary investigative processes are not only
possible and well understood, but work to improve and further refine them has only
intensified and received additional funding after 9/11. Indeed, a country providing a
nuclear weapon to the PCCTS, Knights Templar could not have reasonable assurances
that it would not come back to haunt them, either through investigation or interrogation
of those that carried out the attack.
That country would be opening itself up to responsibility and accountability for our
actions. Again, the material will almost certainly be traced back to that country. And it
would be them that suffered the consequences.
The closest historical use of a nuclear proxy was North Koreas attempt to share some
civilian technology with Syria (dual-use precursor technologies). It quickly decided that
the entire idea was too risky and sold Syria out to Israel and the United States, resulting
in Israeli airstrikes in Western Syria in 2007. So while the concern about technology
sharing is real (and validated by the now infamous network of A.Q. Khan), there are also
limitations to how much one country is willing to risk for an autonomous Crusader
movement. The Israeli bombing and North Korea’s betrayal of Syria will not be soon
But most importantly, the PCCTS, Knights Templar are currently unwilling to detonate a
nuclear warhead above 0,1-0,2 kt device as the civilian casualties would be too great. A
large warhead (several kilotons) would be worthless to us. Furthermore, we currently
lack the resources and competence to successfully reverse engineer large nuclear
warheads and creating small nuclear devices (briefcase size devices). We may re-
evaluate these options at a later time.
3.57 Using European nuclear power plants as a weapon of mass destruction
“There are no limitations but those we inflict on ourselves...!”
Chernobyl, an accident or the most successful anti-Marxist attack in recorded history?
Many political analysts claim that the Chernobyl accident was one of two primary factors
(Chernobyl + Afghanistan) which broke the back of the Soviet Union. This is perhaps
true, at least it contributed significantly to the fall of this Marxist terror regime. But what
if it wasn’t an accident at all but rather the actions of a Ukrainian nationalist military cell
which had successfully infiltrated the plant? These brave anti-Marxist operatives might
have infiltrated the facility and posed as plant-workers. They sabotaged the facility and
caused the accident well knowing how much damage it would cause to the Soviet Union.
As this scenario seems farfetched it is still hard to completely rule out the possibility.
Obviously, it was not in the interest of the Soviet Union to admit to such a “military”
defeat and it was not in the interest of the armed Ukrainian nationalist movement to take
credit for the attack. Taking credit for such a devastating attack would prompt the Soviet
tyrants to completely wipe out all Ukrainian nationalists and patriotic sympathisers as a
result. How many millions did the Soviet Union massacre; 40-60 million? And how many
more would it have massacred had it not been for this brave Ukrainian nationalist cell?
They inflicted massive civilian suffering, tens of thousands dying of cancer (a majority
was caused by a significant delay in evacuation though and cannot be blamed on the
cell). However, at the same time they may have actually saved millions from certain
This also raises an important question. Would it be morally justifiable to initiate an attack
of this magnitude in order to end a genocidal and evil regime committed to wiping out
everything European? It is important to understand how much power we, the National
Resistance Movements of Europe possess over human life. A Justiciar Knight has a lot of
responsibility to make just choices based on pragmatical evaluations and considerations.
A Justiciar Knight must never act blindly and based on hate alone. Hate will drive you to
the most disproportionate actions resulting in excessive and unnecessary suffering.
Thorough pragmatical estimations must be made in order to make our decisions as
With our current regimes, over the next 5 decades:
How many of our sisters have and will be raped by Muslims?
How many Europeans will be ravaged, robbed, beaten, terrorised or killed by Muslims?
How many of our brothers and sisters will commit suicide due to these atrocities?
How many Europeans will die in the future Christian-Muslim war on European soil?
Hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions?
Can we afford to speculate in the outcome of the coming Christian-Muslim war? What if we
lose? How many Europeans will be massacred or enslaved by Islamic forces on European
soil if we lose? Hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions just like in Anatolia or India?
How many patriotic oriented individuals will be ridiculed and persecuted by our
See all charges 1-8 for a complete overview of atrocities committed directly or indirectly
by the current cultural Marxist regimes.
Expected Muslim atrocity report for the next 10 years (see: Muslim atrocities committed
against Western Europeans 1960-2010 (2020)):
1 million+ of our sisters raped.
3-4 million+ of our brothers and sisters ravaged, robbed, beaten, terrorised
30 000-40 000+ murdered directly/indirectly (suicide due to atrocities)
When you compare these numbers to the casualty report of a future Chernobyl attack it
is obvious that the above numbers would be equivalent to 10-50 Chernobyl attacks.
Considerations and evaluation of strike
The European Resistance Movements will have to re-evaluate our future assault methods
closely and based on our ideological success as a result of using conventional weapons of
mass destruction (WMDs).
What if a majority of our future cells are annihilated by EUSSR agents or if they somehow
manage to pacify us through harsh monitoring laws? What if they succeed in their pursuit
to suppress and persecute us? Based on our success or failure in using conventional
weapons, we might end up in a situation where we will have to consider the possibility to
use drastic measures in order to financially devastate our enemies. Pragmatical
operational reasoning involves using methods which will yield the maximum results for a
minimum of invested resources (euro by euro, hour by hour, requiring a minimal number
of sacrificed martyrs).
If we are unsuccessful in achieving concession from them and they continue with the
indirect ongoing genocide of Europeans we will have to consider using methods which
were deemed too extreme in the past.
The Chernobyl disaster broke the back of the Soviet Union. A new Chernobyl disaster in
the heart of Western Europe will break the back of the EUSSR, have no doubt. Causing a
new Chernobyl disaster on a multiculturalist regime would completely cripple them and
might eventually lead to the collapse of the EU altogether or any targeted individual
regime. However, it would potentially cause massive civilian suffering and/or hundreds of
thousands or even millions of internally displaced individuals (refugees). A new Chernobyl
disaster in the heart of the EU will not be as devastating (civilian suffering) as that in
Ukraine/Belarus. Western European regimes will not wait a week before informing and
evacuating the public so the number of individuals affected will be significantly less
(estimated to less than 10 000-50 000).
It may be required to make such sacrifices in order to end this experimental
multiculturalist nightmare and genocide. Sometimes, the situation requires us to be cruel
and kill a limited number of civilians (indirect casualties in shock/sabotage attacks) in
order to prevent much more severe long term atrocities against our peoples. In fact,
from a pragmatical viewpoint, it would be inhuman not to act in a cruel manner when the
alternative is much worse. Just focus on targets that can be morally justified and accept
casualty numbers that are far from exceeding the alternative future atrocities.
The resettlement of millions, mass building of new housing units, financial compensation
for up to several millions will bankrupt any multiculturalist European country and will
force them to halt all Muslim immigration. Furthermore, it will cause the regime to cut all
funding of minority groups and foreign aid and instead focus on rebuilding. The costs will
be astronomic and in today’s currency amount to as much as 1000-5000 billion Euro
which is enough to bankrupt any regime. The regime will have no choice but to
drastically reduce their over-inflated public sector resulting in hundreds of thousands of
unemployed. All Western European countries will be forced to immediately halt all Muslim
immigration as they are forced to help the internally driven European “refugees”.
People who are already suffering will finally be freed from the ideological shackles
(political correctness) that prevented them from standing up and fight for what they
believe in. Standing up for their ideals will involve suffering. However, at this point the
suffering is already prevalent so they will have nothing to lose. These conditions will be
favourable for further consolidation and for the creation patriotic armed militias.
Eventually, the conditions will be there for a military coup and we will fully take
advantage of this window of opportunity.
If we successfully manage to seize political and military control of at least one Western
European country in phase 1 (as a result of a regime collapse caused by the nuclear
power plant attack) we may actually manage to deport all Muslims before they become a
majority, and by doing so we potentially save millions of European lives from the war that
most certainly awaits us when the Muslims in any given country become the dominating
force and grow overconfident. Inflicting cruel cancer deaths on 1000 - 10 000 Europeans
(in P1) might actually be the most humane thing we do, if their sacrifice contributes to
prevent a bloody Christian-Muslims civil war (in P3) resulting in millions of deaths. And
what if we lose the Christian-Muslims civil war in P3? A worst case scenario will be a
repetition of the Hindu Kush genocides (80 million massacred Hindus, 100 million
enslaved) resulting in the massacre and enslavement of an equivalent amount of
Europeans should the Muslims dominate us one day.
Deadline - January 1
The PCCTS, Knights Templar will allow all Western European regimes to capitulate to our
demands and we are hereby giving them a deadline which is January 1
, 2020. We will
not initiate any nuclear power plant attacks until the deadline has passed (we will instead
focus on non-nuclear attacks until then). However, if the Western European
multiculturalist regimes do not fully implement our demands - stop the European
genocide, deport all Muslims from Europe and ban multiculturalism as an anti-European
hate ideology - by this date, we are committed to effectuate ALL necessary measures in
order to stop them from annihilating everything European (see complete overview of
demands in another chapter). This decision is not mine to make but must be decided by
future Justiciar Knight Commanders based on several factors. At that point, diplomatic
and conventional military efforts will have been exhausted. The following overview is to
prepare all current and future European PCCTS, Knights Templar cells for what lies
ahead. I have included an overview over potential targets. The planning phase should be
initiated at least 5-10 years prior to the execution of the attack (as we might rely on
insiders), which will happen after the deadline at earliest. All committed individuals will
have ample time to take a relevant education granting them access to W. European
Nuclear facilities. At that point, given that the Western European multiculturalist regimes
ignore our demands; operation “Regime Ender” can be justified and will be implemented.
3.58 Nuclear power plant assault strategy: “Operation Regime Ender”
Assault team: 2-3 man cell (1 Justiciar Knight Commander, 1-2 JK operatives)
Extraction/exit strategy: martyrdom operation, no chance of survival due to massive
Minimum funding required: 50 000 – 300 000 Euro
Primary WMD: 1 x 2-7 ton “barrack buster” WMD, depending on strength of containment
building. A smaller charge (50-200kg charge) may have to be transported inside the
containment building to the secondary containment structure (if that facility has one) as
the blast from a large single source detonation may be unable to destroy the reactor inside
the containment building due to the fact that a secondary containment structure shielded
against the initial blast. Not all nuclear power plants use a secondary containment structure
(see other approaches).
Method of delivery: aerial or ground vessel, alternatively smaller charges are brought inside
the facility and placed near reactor. A small scooter vehicle that has a carrying capacity of
100-500kg may be used to transport the charge(s) from the truck outside.
Equipment required: 2 trucks (one for the primary WMD and one for the secondary freight
vehicle, the smaller secondary mobile bomb, the makeshift bridge and the load of
gasoline/rubber/tar mix), full body armour, assault rifles, grenades, armour penetration
rounds. The assault team will bring extra equipment for any infiltrators already at the
Operation description: containment building and all containment barriers must be
destroyed, reactor must be destroyed (optimally while online and before the Reactor
Protective System has been activated), the load of gasoline/rubber will be placed and lit
inside and close to the reactor to ensure the development of significant plumes (further
Potential obstacles: multiple armed guards, 1-2 checkpoints with armed personnel, each
with anti-vehicle barriers (either tire puncturing devices or other anti-vehicle barriers).
The compound is likely to be encircled by at least one concrete wall.
Assault strategy 1 (no insiders): An assault team of three Justiciar Knights, depending
on plant security, might be enough to neutralise the checkpoint guards (based on the
number of armed guards). Some facilities will have many; others will have no armed
guards at all. Deception might prove valuable. F example by posing as representatives
from the fire authorities, forging IDs, insignia and uniforms. Bomb truck may be modifies
so it mimics a fire truck.
Assault strategy 2 (no insiders): An assault team of three Justiciar Knights. Two fights
their way inside, forces the plant workers to take the reactor online and deactivates the
interior bomb shield, then detonates a smaller charge (50 kg) destroying the reactor. One
Knight should study the safety systems and learn how to turn the reactor online, unless
restricted by keys, password, etc. As soon as this is done the third Knight (who is
outside waiting in the “barrack buster truck”) detonates the load and tears a hole in the
containment building. A truck containing gasoline/rubber with a bridge device might be
required to ensure that the required plumes are generated inside which will transport the
radiation to the athmosphere. It is likely that the interior bomb shield is likely to activate
automatically as soon as the first explosion detonates. In this case, a total of 3 bombs
will be required (1 large, 2 smaller).
Assault strategy 3 (1 insider+2): An assault team of two Justiciar Knights might be
enough to neutralise the checkpoint guards given that one Justiciar Knight works at the
checkpoint undercover. The undercover guard can easily neutralise the other checkpoint
guards, deactivate security measures and open the gates.
Assault strategy 4 (insider assault – similar to the Chernobyl attack): An assault team
of 2 armed Justiciar Knight insiders might be enough to shut down/sabotage the Reactor
Protective System (ECCS and SLCS) by f. example sabotage certain reactor emergency
systems so that the system cannot initiate an automatic SCRAM procedure and: 1.
sabotage the emergency diesel generators and 2: rupture a large coolant pipe in the
location that is considered to place the reactor in the most danger. However, due to the
airtight containment building this insider assault would need an external Justiciar Knight
to blow a hole in the building or cause the structure to collapse. The outside Knight would
need to be heavily armed and successfully manage to place a load of 4000-7000 kg of
explosives close to the containment building in order for the leakage to reach the
Assault strategy 5 (aerial assault): A civilian aircraft with enough carrying capacity to
hold 2-5 ton of cargo may be used. The detonation has to be timed perfectly as the blast
radius has to be able to destroy the containment bulding. Testing shows that many
containment buildings can withstand a direct hit by both fighter jets and even civilian
airliners. However, it is uncertain how a civilian aircraft loaded with explosives would
cause. There is a no-fly-zone surrounding the facility. Any ground to air missile devices (if
any) placed close to the facility may pose a threat to the aircraft.
Assault strategy 6 (aerial assault): Not a very realistic scenario but in any case: at
least two of the cell members infiltrate a military compound (the closest one to the power
plant) and uses a fighter jet loaded with a bunker buster missile to destroy the reactor. I
am not even sure if bunker buster missiles exist though or if there are any jet fighter
missiles which has the potency to penetrate a containment building (they are sometimes
constructed to withstand missile attacks). Justiciar Knights already working within the air
force may serve this purpose as well as long as one of them can operate a fighter jet and
the other one has the competence to fuel and arm it. Unlikely scenario.
End note: for plants with a containment building and a
secondary containment structure (fully or partly
submerged underground), a secondary or even a
tertiary explosive device may be required based on the
damage inflicted by the primary blast. 100 kg for the
secondary and tertiary bomb should be enough. The
problem here is that the carrying capacity of an
individual is 50 kg at best which reduces the possibilities
to transport a secondary bomb inside the facility.
However, based on the size and shape of the crater after
the initial blast (and whether the structure collapsed or
not), a larger secondary bomb (200-500kg) can be
transported inside the facility using a transportation
device such as a snow-mobile or a re-designed scooter.
Components to create/deploy a makeshift bridge over
the crater may be necessary in order for the vehicle to
safely cross the crater. A study of the target facility is
required in order to evaluate the desired attack strategy.
Our reliance on plumes
Let’s imagine the following scenario:
The containment building and all containment barriers were breached by the primary
“barrack buster” (4000-7000 kg)
The reactor was successfully destroyed while being in an on-line state
As our primary goal is not to destroy the reactor alone but to ensure a significant release
of highly radioactive fallout into the atmosphere and over an extensive geographical
area, we rely on plumes caused by fire (momentum) as the “transportation method”. We
may have to consider including a third truck loaded with a mix of gasoline and tar/rubber
and detonate it as close to the reactor as possible (optimally inside the containment
building). Alternatively a load of 2000 litres of gasoline/rubber/tar mix may be included
in the second truck and placed strategically inside and close to the reactor by the
scooter/snow-mobile prior to or after we destroy the reactor. This would result in the
development of significant plumes transporting highly radioactive fallout into the
atmosphere and would thus drastically increase the estimated “Exclusion zone”.
At this point in time 1 Justiciar Knight may already be dead and the two others severely
contaminated. The final goal for the contaminated Knights will be to prevent all rescue
Sealing the blast hole in the containment building (depending on the radius of the whole)
Putting out the fires for the next 60 minutes
The regime will counter this strategy by sending in an assault team (with hazmat suits).
These suits will prevent them from fighting efficiently. The Knights final stand will cause a
significant delay of the regimes counter-measures.
Financial losses and human suffering relating to the successful implementation
of: “Operation Regime Ender”
Documents you may be interested
Documents you may be interested