conservatives of Europe, especially Christians, nationalists, traditionalists but also
capitalists, failed to defend the cultural conservative world view unlike the cultural
conservative movements in Japan and later South Korea. The reason for this was
because of the general institutionalised persecution of nationalist/traditionalist oriented
individuals after WW2 in Europe due to the defeat of the Nazis. The logic was; since the
NSDAP were nationalists, among other things, all conservatives, nationalists and
traditionalists are automatically Nazis and therefore evil. This notion was allowed to be
developed and was later manifested through the new ideology; multiculturalism/extreme
egalitarianism, which is an anti-European hate ideology designed to deconstruct our
European cultures, traditions, identities, Christendom and even our national states.
Another factor was that an overwhelming majority of the right wing were not, and still
aren’t today, politically active. The Marxists have always had a talent for infiltration and
psychological warfare, infiltrating everything from Workers Unions to hippie movements,
environmentalist movements, universities, news corporations which they used to further
project and propagate their cultural world views. They have also traditionally been a lot
more active when it comes to arranging demonstrations (often spearheaded through the
Workers Unions and other organisations they had already infiltrated), while the right wing
were, and still are, usually only focused on serving their own needs, feeding their own
egos, developing their companies and generally minding their own business.
Ok, back on topic; what on earth are the Nordic/Germanic tribes and why are we
disallowed to preserve especially the Nordic/Germanic tribes today?
In order to understand the evil and suicidal European Marxism of today you must first
learn about National Socialism:
Nordicism (also referred to as the"Nordic theory") is the ideology of racial superiority which
claims that the Nordic race (the Germanic peoples/tribes), would constitute a master race
because of an innate capacity for initiative, long term planning and leadership. The
reasoning for this theory is that the Nordic peoples has been forced to, due to the cold
arctic climate, to logistically plan ahead for up to 6 months per year to be able to survive
the cold winters. In addition, all the weak elements of the tribe usually perished due to the
harsh climate leaving only the strong and intelligent left. When this process of elimination
was the case for specific tribes over a timeline consisting of thousands of years it is claimed
that the descendants are superior when it comes to initiative, long term planning and
intelligence compared to people who live in warm climates with easy access to food and
water. Nordicism was prevalent mainly in the late-19th and early 20th centuries in Western
Europe and North America and came to be a major influence on Nazism. Multiculturalism is
a reactionary ideology to Nordicism which in many ways aims to completely wipe out the
Germanic tribes and other European tribes as Europeans are defined, according to hardcore
internationalist Marxists, as a cancer to this world as it is claimed that our ancestors where
evil. As such, the ideology of multiculturalism, which of course only applies to European
countries (“the white man is the devil, not the yellow man – Japan/South Korea”).
Madison Grant, in his book The Passing of the Great Race:
Madison Grant, in his book The Passing of the Great Race, defined the "Nordic" type as
"long skulled, very tall, fair skinned, with blond hair and light colored eyes. The Nordics
inhabit the countries around the North and Baltic Seas, and include not only the great
Scandinavian and Teutonic groups, but also other early peoples who first appear in
southern Europe and in Asia as representatives of Aryan language and culture." The
Germanic tribes is another word for Nordics.
While the concept of Nordic race became intertwined with a northern and northeastern
European cultural identity, the Alpine race was thought to predominate in central/Eastern
Europe through to Turkey and the Eurasian steppes of Central Asia and Southern Russia
and was said to be characterised by short stature, dark hair, dark eyes, narrower shoulders,
a darker complexion and comparatively round head. The Mediterranean race was thought to
be prevalent in Southern Europe, the Middle East and North Africa as well as in Wales, and
was said to be characterised by dark hair, dark eyes, aquiline nose, swarthy complexion,
moderate-to-short stature, and moderate or long skull.
Present and current distribution of Nordics, Alpines and Mediterranean’s in Europe:
According to Madison Grant and several other authors; there are three European races.
These are; Nordics/Germanics (Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Germany, Finland
and to a high degree the UK, Ireland, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Benelux, Baltic’s,
Switzerland but also to a large degree Russia, Ukraine and Belarus (the Nordic parts).
There are also 40-80 million Nordics in the US and a few million in Canada and Australia.
As covered in another chapter; within approximately 100-150 years or within 4-5
generations (if the current development is allowed to continue) the Germanic/Nordic race
in several countries will be diluted or annihilated to such a degree that there will be no
one left with Nordic physical characteristics; blond hair, blue eyes, high forehead, sturdy
cheekbones. As such, the Nordic tribes will become extinct if we do not resist and seize
political and military control of our countries. To illustrate the ongoing demographic
annihilation of the Nordic peoples; in 1900 there were 50% Nordics in the US (blonde
hair, blue eyes). But now, as a result of primarily non-European immigration, there was
in 2008 ONLY 16%.
The only way to prevent the ongoing genocide of the Nordic tribes is if either;
The Marxist regimes in Europe grant us privileges by either completely liberalising the
biotechnology-laws. They must encourage and even directly sponsor repro-genetics
programs on a private and/or state level, which facilitates reproduction clinics who focus
strictly on indigenous genotypes from pure sources (non-diluted (95-99% pure) Nordic
genotypes) found in Northern Sweden and other areas where this is available. The
European Marxist regimes will never allow or contribute to this which only leaves two
Conservatives/nationalists/traditionalists in each European country are given reservations
where we can exercise autonomy (political control) just like the Native Americans after
their defeat against the US Army. This is not acceptable yet to a large majority of
conservatives as we expect to defeat the cultural Marxist regimes of Europe within 70
years. The third option should be outlined as follows;
Conservatives must seize political and military power through a combination of armed and
democratic struggle within 70 years and implement the above policies. The alternative is
the continued bastardisation model, very similar to the Brazilian model; where it has been
(due to the Brazilian Marxist revolution) established a melting pot of
European/Asian/African mix. These policies have proven to be a catastrophe for Brazil and
other countries that have institutionalised and facilitated widespread race-mixing of
Asians/Europeans/Africans. Brazil has firmly established itself as a second world country
with an extremely poor degree of social cohesion. The results are evident and are
manifested through a large degree of corruption, lacking productivity and eternal conflict
between the various competing “cultures” as the myriad of newly established “sub-tribes”
(black, mulatto, mestizo, white) paralyzes any hope of ever reaching the same level of
productivity and harmony as f example Scandinavia, Germany, South Korea or Japan.
Seeing the lack of social cohesion in Brazil, and the average productivity of the average
Brazilian, it is evident that a similar approach in Europe would be devastating and
nationally retarding, not to mention that it would be a grave crime (genocide) to contribute
in any way to the annihilation, deconstruction and genocide of the indigenous peoples
which are Nordic by definition.
Argumentation techniques - Victor vs. victim?
Instead of overly focusing on formulating arguments based on the superiority and
intelligence of Europeans you should primarily focus on indigenous European rights; that
the Nordic tribes and the rest of the European tribes are on its stabile course towards
extinction because of multiculturalisms facilitation of Islamic demographic warfare.
Instead of just presenting arguments, convert arguments into questions. The best
arguments ARE often questions.
What will the government do to prevent the ongoing Islamic demographical warfare against
What will they do to prevent the Nordic ethnic group in given country from going extinct?
How do they justify the ongoing demographical annihilation of the Europeans?
Why do they continue to allow mass-Muslim immigration in combination with Marxist
procreation policies (feminism resulting in a low birth rate) when they know that these
policies will result in our extinction?
Why are they so arrogant that they claim that the only solution to our problems, the
cultural conservative world view, is an evil Nazi ideology while the cause of all our
problems, their cultural Marxist world view, is the only truth?
Why are the Native Americans granted reservations (completely reserved for their ethnic
group) while indigenous Europeans aren’t awarded the same basic human rights?
Why are the indigenous Native American tribes treated with more dignity and respect than
indigenous European tribes?
These are all good questions we should focus on in the decades to come. A good strategy
in Europe is therefore to focus on indigenous rights. Preserving our “tribe”, our culture,
traditions, Christendom etc. is in fact the most basic of all human rights that takes
absolute precedent before ridiculous Marxist-humanist demands for allowing another 10
million Islamic asylum seekers residence.
Be on the offensive; never argue in a defensive manner. No matter what approach you
choose, when f example defending the fallen martyrs of our movements, be smart. Don’t
go into specific topics in situations where it isn’t relevant. You will easily lose the
discussion if you talk about Islamisation and you suddenly start to discuss the Nordic
genotypes. Islam is not a race after all but an ideology. Separate the discussions and
stick to each topic instead of cross shifting. These argumentation techniques are all
reverse-engineered Marxist arguments and are all very effective. The Marxists have
traditionally been the best propagandists and we have a lot to learn from them. NEVER
underestimate our enemy!
The true definition of racism vs. the Marxist definition
C# Word - Word Conversion in C#.NET
Word documents in .NET class applications independently, without using other external third-party dependencies like Adobe Acrobat. Word to PDF Conversion. how to add text to pdf document; add text to pdf
Don’t let the multiculturalists define what racism is or isn’t. Keeping an African against
his will in your basement as a slave is racism. Loving your extended family/your ethnic
group and fighting for ethnic and/or indigenous rights does not make you a racist, quite
the opposite in fact. It makes you a civil rights activist. Creating a pro-indigenous and/or
pro-ethnic movement does not make it a “white supremacy” movement but rather an
Indigenous rights movement or even a civil rights movement. Anyone who calls you a
racist due to these reasons proves very clearly that HE is the real racist, as he obviously
ONLY attacks European rights movements. He is therefore an anti-European racist
supporting the anti-European hate ideology known as multiculturalism.
The cultural Marxists/multiculturalists have gone to great lengths to change the very
definition of the word; racist. Europeans having African slaves on a plantation WAS racist,
the apartheid system WAS racist (deportation and a two state solution would have been
the right way to go). However, loving your ethnic group and fighting for the interests of
your tribe is NOT and will never be racist. Nevertheless, the cultural Marxist systems
would have everyone think otherwise.
Creating a pan-Nordic union?
I don’t see why we shouldn’t actively strive for the establishment of a Nordic League
propagating Nordic interests, following the design of the Arab League. After all, why
shouldn’t we, Scandinavians, Nordics, Germans and to a large degree Brits, Americans,
Polish, Czechs, Swiss, people from Benelux and Balticum be allowed to feel pride in our
ethnic heritage and fight for our ethnic interests? Shouldn’t WE have the EQUAL right to
actively pursue and protect our interest based on ethnic origin when Arabs, Pashtuns,
Africans, Kurds, Tibetans, Aboriginals, Native Americans, Rom/Gypsies are allowed to?
Why are we labeled as Nazi monsters when we do and they are tolerated, encouraged
and even supported financially? The answer has been explained in this compendium on
multiple occasions. It is because the current US/EU cultural Marxist hegemony is a racist
and evil empire which has embraced a hate ideology equal to Stalinist Communism and
Nazism. Multiculturalism IS as evil and racist as Nazism and as brutal as Stalinism. They
don’t use the same persecution methods, instead they ratify hate laws and get their
propaganda machine (MSM) to character assassinate people, ridicule them resulting in
conservatives losing their jobs, family and committing suicide. Multiculturalism must be
destroyed as soon as possible, or we, all European tribes, will seize to exist within 100
You are not alone - 14 David’s against one Goliath
I am extremely proud of my ethnic group, Norwegians which is a Northern-Germanic
tribe. Furthermore, I seek to serve Norwegian AND European interests in everything I do.
I would not hesitate to sacrifice my own life for the English, Slavic, Jewish, Indian, Latin
or French tribes in their fight against the EUSSR/US multiculturalist hegemony. All
European and non-European conservatives, nationalists and traditionalists must support
each other as this cultural Marxist/multiculturalist global hegemony is our common
enemy. I would never betray a brother tribe whether it be a Scandinavian, Frankish,
English, Latin, Slavic or other European tribe. It is essential that we fight for Europe,
consolidate cross borders, and do our best to acknowledge that this is a European
struggle. Because after all; the destruction of the US/EU cultural Marxist tyranny cannot,
obviously, be defeated by Norwegians alone, nor Brits, nor European Americans. ANY
Christian European, anywhere in the world, can become a Justiciar Knight for the Knights
Templar. As a Justiciar Knight you have been given the mandate to execute category A
and B traitors by the war crimes tribunal known as PCCTS, Knights Templar. This is a
Pan-European civil war and its outcome will decide the very survival of our peoples
C# Excel - Excel Conversion & Rendering in C#.NET
Excel documents in .NET class applications independently, without using other external third-party dependencies like Adobe Acrobat. Excel to PDF Conversion. how to add text fields in a pdf; add text pdf file acrobat
whether you are a French, Greek, European American, European Canadian, European
Australian, Afrikaner/Boer etc. We will not win this war unless we work together as
So, back to the initial question; what type of rhetorical approach should you use when
openly arguing against the demographical annihilation of the Nordic ethnic groups or any
other European ethnic groups?
Marxist demonisation techniques and psychological warfare
Sadly, you will be indirectly or directly labeled as a racist or even as a Nazi monster by
the Marxist establishment (government institutions and the MSM - multiculturalist media)
if you attempt to openly argue for the immediate halt to the ongoing demographical
genocide of the Nordic peoples. However, you can use other words than “race” to more
effectively dodge such characteristics. By using words as tribe or ethnic group you may
be able to more effectively communicate your message.
It should be noted that NSDAP did not win the initial election by propagating their true
agenda. The “political game” is not any different today. You can never win an election by
being honest. The Internationalist Marxist aren’t honest and never have been (they want
to destroy/deconstruct everything European) and, unfortunately, neither can we (we
want to save/preserve everything European). The appropriate way is therefore to be
careful when arguing and at least keep the ideals alive within ourselves and in an un-
official ideological environment until the day it is possible to implement ALL of our
policies. Sticking to anti-Islamisation rhetorical strategies is one convenient way of doing
this. We don’t have a lot of time, only 70 years max until the Muslims reach 60%, so we
must act as soon as possible and continue the ongoing European conservative
consolidation process until the time we, collectively as European revolutionary
movements, are strong enough to successfully effectuate the first European coup d’état
with enough backing from our own police/military forces and a nuclear power (from
Russia f example) to prevent a subsequent US/NATO intervention.
End note: the PCCTS, Knights Templar are not in any way Nazi sympathizers. Preserving
your tribe, cultural and demographical, is a basic human right and has nothing to do with
“white supremacy”. After all, we do not seek to enslave or in any way harm or exploit
Africans, Asians or their respective countries. We are a conservative organisation
propagating cultural isolationism, similar to South Korea and Japan unlike the NSDAP
which was a left wing organisation, they hated Christendom, capitalism and propagated a
strict definition of socialism. So do not make the mistake of allowing the
Marxists/multiculturalists to label you as a Nazi. As a Justiciar Knight of Knights Templar
Europe, we are anti-Nazi and approximately 40% of our policies do not coincide with
Race-mixing and interracial relations; necessary to create the global utopia lead
by the Marxist-Islamic UN or the ultimate crime?
The PCCTS, Knights Templar, obviously, does not have any pre-defined specific policies or
principles concerning race-mixing. The following are my own views concerning the
I have for a long time dreaded the thought of writing an essay about this subject.
Primarily because it is considered politically incorrect by even many of the most
dedicated conservatives and it is considered an efficient way to commit character suicide
for individuals who have ambitions to appeal to the bulk of the masses in this early stage
of the European civil war. On the other hand, if you’re Arab, Pashtun, Kurd, Pakistani,
Japanese, South Korean or belong to any other non-European tribe then it’s a completely
different matter. Then it’s all about showing cultural tolerance and respecting their
customs. But if you’re a European and say the same thing, God forbid, then you’re a
monster. This double standard effectively shows us the anti-European nature of
multiculturalism. A large amount of the current multiculturalist elites in the EU/US, the
category A and B traitors specifically, are focused on the destruction of European culture,
Christendom, European identity and there is not a more efficient way of destroying the
core of everything European than facilitating the gradual deconstruction of the European
ethnic groups. The norm and practice for adopting non-European babies has more or less
been institutionalised, bio-laws have been restricted, mass non-European immigration
has been encouraged along with allowing and even subsidising the non-European
explosive birth rates.
The sum of these deliberate genocidal practices when mixed with Marxist procreation
policies (feminism) is equal to the demographical annihilation of European ethnic groups
if they are allowed to continue.
A majority of conservative revolutionaries have been familiar with these methods of
deliberate cultural annihilation for decades now. I know for a fact that it can be very
frustrating to fight for reversal of the above doctrines because you feel like an ant trying
to defeat a 7-headed monster.
Any public figure that openly opposes race-mixing or interracial relations and instead
propagate the preservation of his tribe is aggressively persecuted, ridiculed and/or
ignored by the European multiculturalist regimes, manifested by NGOs and the cultural
Marxist mainstream media. So basically; if you as a public figure, utter any opposition or
reservation to race-mixing, your career will likely be instantly destroyed. The
multiculturalist glorification of race-mixing and interracial relations does, however, not
correspond to or reflect reality, the wishes and the views of the large majority of
I would claim that approximately 80-90% of Europeans (95% of men and 65% of
women) have chosen or will choose to find a partner within their ethnic group while more
than 95% of Asians and 95% of Africans will chose the same path. These people reject
the notion of finding a partner (with the intention to procreate) outside their own tribe.
These are facts that obviously do not correspond to the cultural Marxist desire to create a
“one-world, one people”, united under the Marxist-Islamic UN.
The cultural establishment, spear-headed by the entertainment industry and the MSM are
doing everything they can to glorify and propagate race-mixing by creating movies,
series and other coverage which illustrate “happy interracial couples” in the hopes that
they will succeed to indoctrinate as many as possible. Very few people are buying into
this though as they see the dire consequences of this irreversible action.
Would you actively contribute to further the demographical annihilation of your
80-90% of all Europeans would oppose (or at least be disappointed) if their sons and
daughters married and/or procreated with a non-European. This principle and tradition of
procreating within the tribe is universal and applies to the great majority of the world’s
races and ethnic groups whether they are Japanese, Pashtun, Arab, South Korean,
European American, Russian, French, and Swedish etc.
It is a well known fact that an overwhelming number of ethnic groups consider
racial/ethnic purity to be the very center of their cultural identity. Those familiar with
Taiwanese, South Korean and Japanese culture can attest to that. Racial/ethnic purity IS
and always has been extremely important to the Japanese and South Koreans (in
addition to Europeans and Arabs), in fact so much that attitudes concerning these
matters are completely dominating without these principles being actually written down.
This is also the case in more or less every single non-cultural Marxist country. Non-
cultural Marxist countries are commonly known for their societal patriarchal structures
compared to cultural Marxist countries where the matriarchal structures are dominating
(Europe, ex-USSR, US and to a certain degree Latin America).
Arab countries are very concerned with racial/ethnic purity as their Arab origin is directly
connected to their blood-relation to Muhammad. It is considered the greatest of all
honours to have a genetical relation to their prophet. This is so evident that non-Arab
Muslims are considered second class Muslims. Pakistanis, Indonesians, Kurds, Berbers,
Persians and Africans have been severely discriminated for centuries in the Islamic world
as a result of them not being Arab. The Arab League, an important political force in the
greater Middle East works more or less exclusively for ethnic Arab interests. They may
help non-Arabs but will always support Arab interests before other ethnic groups. These
policies of Arabisation are very similar to the Nazi policies before and during WW2 and
involve more than 30 countries in the Middle East and Africa.
Race-mixing propagandists: Heidi Klum, Elin Nordgren, Madonna, Brangelina,
Lady Gaga etc - An irreversible action, the eternal loss of your extended ethnic
The witty comment stating; “if you go black, there is no turning back” actually underlines
the severity of the decision involved in race-mixing. It is quite a paradox as specific
European entertainment stars (including but not limited to Heidi Klum, Elin Nordgren,
Madonna, Brad Pit & Angelina Jolie, Lady Gaga chooses to propagate and glorify race-
mixing either through direct or indirect (adoption) choices. The only reason that many of
these individuals became famous in the first place was specifically due to their
Nordic/European physical characteristics, rare characteristics that have been acquired
through an evolutionary process which has taken more than 1 million years. These
characteristics, both physical and psychological are then wiped out forever, due to their
miscalculated decision. Obviously, the offspring of these entertainment stars will never
receive the same opportunities as they, themselves, once did. It is obvious that Nordic
entertainment super-stars like Scarlett Johansson (60-70% Nordic purity), Gwyneth
Paltrow (70-80%)Pamela Anderson (90-95%), Paris Hilton (70-80%), Taylor Swift (80-
90%) would have never been where they are today hadn’t it been for their distinct Nordic
physical characteristics. They would have never, in a million years, managed to reach
their current status of fame had they belonged to another ethnic group. Same can be
said about several other superstars with Nordic physical features such as individuals from
Marilyn Monroe to Megan Fox. So why not embrace their Nordic gift by contributing to
preserve Nordic culture instead of throwing it away and robbing their children of the
same opportunities they once received? It should be noted that the US was composed of
50% with blue eyes in 1950 but this number has been reduced significantly and was in
2008 only 16%. By 2020 it is estimated to be less than 8%.
Recessive vs. dominant genes
Blue eyes and blond hair (and possibly many psychological traits) almost never survives
a race-mixing process due to the fact that Nordic genotypes are recessive unlike f
example African, Arab or Oriental genotypes which are considerably more genetically
dominant. In order to dominantly dilute an African individual it would require 5
individuals of Nordic descent. Thanks to their parent’s carelessness, their offspring will be
cut off forever from their “extended ethnic family”. They will become, tribe-less
individuals and many are likely to either swear allegiance to extreme cultural
Marxism/multiculturalist ideological views (90%) or choose the extreme right (>10%).
They often hate their parents for what has been done to them, as they are neither
European, African nor Asian.
The Nordic ideal – our tribe counts 200 million individuals as of 2010
There are many non-Nordic that try to mimic Nordic beauty by dying their hair blond and
wearing contacts. So why not offer our children the actual genetical gift instead, through
repro-genetics, rather than spending thousands of Euro and thousands of hours on
make-up trying to mimic the Nordic ideal?
As the Nordic ideal obviously is still prevalent in this multiculturalist world it may not be
too late to prevent the extinction of the Nordic tribes. We are still a strong tribe,
representing the most numerous in Europe, counting more than 200 million individuals
Solutions to prevent the extinction of the Nordic tribes and for implementation
of conservative principles
The key to our survival is to liberalise the strict bio-technology laws and to commercialise
and glorify repro-genetics while there is still a sustainable selection of Nordics of 99%
purity left (this window of opportunity will be forever lost within 150 years). Not only will
we have the option to secure our survival but we will be able to purify our tribe and add
several IQ points to our off-spring in the same process. This solution is non-violent and is
likely to prevent future war as all ethnic groups would have the possibility to secure their
own genetical survival. Repro-genetics offer everything Europe could ever dream of with
very few drawbacks. Loyal and productive non-Europeans would be able to stay as we
wouldn’t live in fear of being demographically conquered or being exploited financially.
In order for this to be a reality, it is only required that ONE single conservative/nationalist
nation leader embrace the idea in the future, as soon as we have managed to seize
political and military control of the specific country. Because as soon as the fruits from
that specific country is revealed to the world, other conservative leaders will have no
choice but to copy the concept. The alternative is that they would significantly fall behind
economically/technologically due to the fact that their average IQ/social cohesion would
be too low in comparison. In addition, they would continue to suffer under the current
myriad of inheritable diseases and conditions which would continue to take a significant
financial toll on the respective regimes. The first anti-Marxist country in Europe to fully
embrace repro-genetics will become the new economical and technological global super
power! And as the European alpha-males instinctual drive to preserve their genes would
be rendered an obsolete concept, it would contribute to a potentially eternal peaceful
Europe providing that other conservative principles (including the policies to prevent
over-population in the world) would be implemented as well.
Obviously, these policies of “civilizational-shaping” nature cannot be implemented by a
mass-democracy of the current European caliber as the current political model lacks
consensus and thus authority and implementation force and efficiency. A future model,
however, similar to the fascio-democratic model of Russia and China has the potency to
implement the required cultural and security reforms. An alternative model where
females have reduced influence on security and cultural issues through a guardian council
has been presented in another chapter.
Race-mixing leads to suicidal children with severe mental problems
The offspring of race-mixers will feel like outcasts and it is very common that these
individuals suffer from severe psychological problems throughout their life. Their parents
obviously do not care as it would appear that their children’s psychological health and
general well being is irrelevant to them. The suicide rate among these individuals is
extremely high, which reflects the suffering they are put through by not having an
extended ethnic family. A majority of Europeans sees ethnic, blood-bonds as the most
essential cultural factor and considers their ethnic tribe to be their extended family. This
issue is extremely politically incorrect to discuss, due to the current cultural Marxist
regimes but it is not a secret that ethnicity remains and will remain as the most
important uniting cultural factor, more so than socio-economic factors, to a majority of
Race-mixed families risk catastrophic consequences as the European civil war
progresses towards phase 2 and 3
After WW2, women who had previously had a relationship and/or children with the
German occupiers would often suffer from severe punishment. The resistance
movements shaved the head of these women and the communities terrorised them for
10 to 20 years after the war. These women and their offspring suffered horribly for a long
time as a result of their decision to mix with individuals from the occupying force. They
were called traitor whores and treated with utter contempt. Many starved to death at the
end of the war while others were even raped and lynched during and after the war.
What will happen to the “traitor whores” after the great European civil war?
The current status of Europe is quite similar to that of WW2. Instead of having to face an
external enemy, the enemies are the Marxists, suicidal humanists and capitalist globalists
of our societies. We are being colonized by Asia and Africa facilitated by the
multiculturalist elites. In Europe, 85%+ of the colonizers are Muslims from various parts
of the world. So who exactly are the “traitor whores” of this war, and what will happen to
them after we seize political and military power within the next 20-70 years?
There are two answers to this question; what we would prefer under current moral
conditions and what actually will happen. It is hard for conservative intellectuals to
predict the brutality of the future as we currently live in seemingly peaceful nations with
seemingly few plagues and horrors. However, when the true agenda of the
multiculturalists is revealed to a greater number than the current 10-15% of people,
many will be furious and demand vengeance. If the current cultural Marxist regimes
refuse to capitulate and continue their atrocities the demand for blood vengeance will
The manifestation of the reckoning will depend on many factors;
1. Will the cultural Marxists/multiculturalists capitulate in time?
2. How many more conservatives will be persecuted, ridiculed and pushed towards suicide
before they capitulate?
3. How many more revolutionary conservatives will have to martyr themselves before they
4. How will they treat us in prison, if we survive our operations, as prisoners of war?
Documents you may be interested
Documents you may be interested