The Indian security fence
The concept of building security fences between groups of people is not limited to Israel.
In 1989, the Indian government, frustrated at the continued infiltration of terrorists from
Pakistan, constructed a security barrier along the frontier in the states of Punjab and
Rajasthan. The barrier worked and infiltration subsided. Five years later, India sought to
extend the barrier 620 miles through Jammu and Kashmir. The Pakistani government's
reaction to India's barrier-building was harsh. Islamabad accused India of violating both
the U.N. charter and the two countries' cease fire agreement. In July 2003, Pakistani
military spokesman, Shaukat Sultan, made several threats.
But the Indian government ignored these threats, citing its right to defend itself against
terrorism. After all, since 1989 more than 40,000 people have perished in Jammu and
Kashmir in terrorism and insurgency-related violence. And, just as Israel has found its
barrier to be a successful deterrent, so, too, has India. According to the chief-of-staff of
the Indian army, Nirmal Chand Vij, the number of terrorists inside Jammu and Kashmir
plummeted almost 50 percent in the year after the barrier's construction. The fence
stopped almost 90 percent of infiltration attempts. India's vote against Israel's West Bank
barrier may have undermined its own position, a fact that was not lost on at least one
Pakistani senator. In a July debate in the Pakistani senate, Ishaq Dar suggested that
Islamabad parlay the ICJ ruling into a move to condemn India's fence construction along
The physical separation (apartheid) of the Indians and the Pakistani Muslims works as
intended. The Islamic terrorist attacks have been reduced significantly since the creation
of this physical barrier.
The Saudi security fence
The kingdom of Saudi Arabia, one of Israel's most vociferous critics in the Middle East
and a staunch financial supporter of groups such as Hamas, has also constructed a
border fence on disputed land. Saudi Arabia and Yemen have disputed their border for
more than seventy years. Both countries dispute the demarcation laid out in the 1934
Taif treaty, and today, almost 1,000 miles of desert and mountains remain undefined.
While both countries may initially have been content to live with the status quo, that
changed with the 1990 discovery of oil in the disputed zone. The Saudi government
moved to build a "military city" near the disputed border. Violence occasionally flared. In
November 1997, for example, after a Yemeni soldier lowered a Saudi flag in the disputed
area of Qarqa'i, several Saudi and Yemeni soldiers died in an exchange of fire. Another
bloody clash took place in January 2000 when Saudi troops occupied Jabal Jahfan, a
mountain long controlled by Yemen. A June 2000 attempt to resolve the dispute failed.
While both Saudi and Yemeni leaders signed the resulting Jeddah treaty, the text left
unresolved large tracts of the border.
Violence erupted in 2002. In the Saudi border town of Jizan, Saudi border guards
confronted Islamists smuggling weapons from Yemen. Thirty-six Saudi soldiers died in
the ensuing fire fight. Following additional violence along the border, the kingdom
decided unilaterally to build a security barrier along their border with Yemen. Saudi
officials claimed that this barrier would stem the weapons flow and almost daily attempts
at infiltration by Islamist insurgents from Yemen. Talal Anqawi, the head of Saudi Arabia's
border guards, dismissed any parallels to Israel's security barrier, telling the Arabic daily
“What is being constructed inside our borders with Yemen is a sort of a screen … which
aims to prevent infiltration and smuggling … it does not resemble a wall in any way.”
If Anqawi sought to create a litmus test for the permissibility of barriers, he failed. While
the ICJ referred to Israel's security fence as a "wall" throughout its decision, less than 5
percent of the barrier is actually concrete slab. The rest is a network of fence and
sensors. While the Saudi government presses the U.N. to sanction Israel to force
compliance with the ICJ decision, the kingdom, through its own actions and statements,
has actually created a precedent for Israel. Saudi statements labeling Israel's security
barrier an "internationally wrongful act" and demanding its "destruction," illustrate the
hypocrisy of both the Saudi and ICJ positions.
Note: Also see apartheid/security fences and population exchanges in Turkey (between
Turkey and Syria), Cyprus (between Muslims and Christians), Morocco (between Morocco
and Western Sahara) and in Northern Ireland.
Good Fences Make Good Neighbours
Israel's fence exists to prevent deadly attacks on Israeli citizens. The Belfast peace lines
exist to prevent large-scale intercommunal disorders … but a barrier is a barrier,
whatever its name … their [British and Israeli] policies towards the nationalist areas of
Belfast and the Palestinian areas of the Holy Land have one thing in common … to
When the ICJ ruled on July 9 that Israel's security barrier was illegal, it based its
decisions exclusively on interpretation of international humanitarian law. Fourteen of the
fifteen judges ruled that Israel should raze its barrier. The one dissenting justice, Thomas
Buergenthal, was American. He argued that the court failed to consider all relevant facts.
He wrote, "The nature of these cross-Green Line attacks and their impact on Israel and
its population are never really seriously examined by the court." While the ICJ claimed
that Israel could not invoke "the right of legitimate or inherent self-defence," Buergenthal
disagreed. After all, in resolutions 1368 and 1373, the U.N. Security Council reaffirmed
the right to combat terrorism without limitation to "state actors only."
And there is little doubt that the security barriers work. Suicide attacks in Israel declined
75 percent in the first six months of 2004 compared to an equivalent period in 2003. The
Israeli government is not alone in this conclusion. Many of the most vocal critics of
Israel's security barrier have employed the same defence. Their immunity from ICJ and
U.N. criticism illustrates both the politicisation of the International Court of Justice and
the inherent bias of the United Nations. U.N. secretary general Kofi Annan's criticism of
Israel's security barrier, especially when juxtaposed with his silence regarding the
region's other security barriers, illustrates the double standard.
Perhaps the greatest tragedy of the ICJ decision, however, is that it creates a precedent
that allows terrorism to trump security. Israel will not be the only victim. The Turkish
government, which vociferously condemned Israel, unwittingly undermined its own
security with regard to Syria. Some Pakistani politicians already seek to use the ICJ's
decision on Israel to undermine India's self-defence. While separate peace processes
proceed in Cyprus, Western Sahara, and Northern Ireland, it was the dampening of
terrorism made possible by the security barriers that allowed the space for diplomats to
resume negotiations. On a number of levels, the ICJ decision was a ruling against peace
and security, not only in Israel but also across the region and elsewhere.
3. The demographical annihilation of the European population in the US due to
Asian, Mexican and African mass immigration (ROUGH DRAFT)
In the early 1980s the US was considered a Christian and European nation. In fact, it was
considered the most powerful European nation. Today, the US is in a rapid state of
disintegration fuelled by mass immigration and the doctrines of multiculturalism/cultural
So what happened exactly and when did it happen?
The story is quite similar to Europe. The Marxists, through applying the doctrines of the
Frankfurt school, disguised their ideology and were perceived as “cultural Marxists”,
humanists and liberals. Just like in Europe, they gradually contributed to transform to the
cultural Marxist/multiculturalist bastion it is today. Most of the methods used are covered
already but I will include a few factors not yet mentioned.
The day when the Democrats and Republicans decided that America should no
longer be a Christian and a European country
“Happy holidays” and “season greetings” you say? What happened to “Merry Christmas”?
Traditionally, the only holidays included in the "season" were Christmas Eve, Christmas
Day, Boxing Day (in some countries), New Year's Eve, New Year's Day and Three Kings
Day. But apparently the US political parties have expanded this term quite recently. Did
they ask the American people if they wanted this or did they implement this in an
Now, thanksgiving, Christmas, Yule, Channukah, Boxing Day, Kwanzaa, and occasionally
Ramadan or the Eid depending on the Islamic calendar, to name a few are considered
equal to Christmas in the US. Because, suddenly the US didn’t have a state religion. You
see, the Democrats and Republicans decided on behalf of all US citizens that the US
should no longer a European and Christian country. Instead, they decided, through a
multitude of undemocratically implemented bills, that they should create a non-European
multicultural nation without a united cultural identity. The people were never allowed to
have their say.
Demographical development of the US – Europeans vs. non Europeans
This article is not yet complete.
Under construction – not edited
3.101 The cultural Marxist war against God and the Church in Western Europe
leads to spiritually bankrupt countries lacking civilizational goals (UNDER
CONSTRUCTION AND NOT EDITED, feel free to complete this essay)
The greatest achievement in humanity was the moon landing, achieved by our European-
American brethren. Since then, cultural Marxism has risen, infiltrated and ravaged both
Western Europe and the US. The mass-democracy model of Western Europe has become
the norm in the Western world, which has cultivated the principle of mediocrity instead of
continuing to pursue excellence.
Marxism is somewhat as crippling as Islam on a civilization so I do not expect we will see
a change in direction until we, the conservative visionaries, have seized military and
political control. Spiritually bankrupt nations without civilizational visions are nothing
more than devastated wastelands of meaningless noise and excessive consumerism,
which alone, has no way of satisfying the individuals longing for something greater than
the feeding of his or her ego. The cultural Marxist elites of Western Europe will never
admit to these facts and they will say that they are in fact allowing Church communities
to operate freely. But what kind of Church survived decades of Marxist assault? Firstly,
the forced ordination of female priests ravaged the very fundament of the Church, which
planted enough Trojans for the European Church to be ridden by internal reforms leading
to the Church we see today. The European Labour Church is now completely stripped of
any and all influence and has been molded to suit the Marxist agenda. Especially the
Protestant Church has been molded into becoming its very own cyanide pill.
The first assault was reforms which involved the forceful ordination of women as priests
and bishops. As we all know, women’s emotionally unstable nature quickly lead to the
propagation of gay marriage, the ordination of gay priests, ignoring chastity, ignoring
peoples duties in relation to procreation, the support for mass-Muslim immigration and
even the inter-religious dialogue with the Muslim community. This dialogue is in fact no
more than a formal discussion for the terms of total surrender. The divine architecture,
richly decorated with sculptures of our most famous and beloved champions and martyrs
of the church (who fought past Crusades against Jihadi invasions) has been replaced with
the Marxist style red-bricked bunker style churches, which has as much appeal as a
public toilet. The divine interior of our beloved churches has been stripped of everything
dignifying and replaced with empty concrete walls with perhaps one single abstract
mosaic of something that may or may not resemble a cross.
Celebration of Christmas and Easter is now considered offensive to Muslims so it is now
inappropriate to actually say; Merry Christmas. Instead we must say; Happy holidays…
And people still doesn’t get it? It can’t be said clearer than this; the Western European
cultural Marxist regimes want you to abandon God and the Church. Perhaps you should
take the hint already. Because as soon as you acknowledge that there is a very real war
being waged by the Marxists through their deliberate objective of completely
deconstruction the European Church, the sooner you can rush to its defense.
Currently, we are embroiled in a bitter spiritual war that will inevitably lead to a physical
Such vitriol always ends up leading to violence, whether it is a genocidal slaughter, or a
civil war – the spiritual war transcends to the physical plane, and God’s people are once
again embroiled in a bloody battle.
Western Europe – a third world region when it comes to spirituality and
The spiritually bankrupt Western European nations result in psychologically unstable
individuals, many which are stripped of moral and decency. This, almost anarchist
behavior, often leads to “excessive whoring around” and results in a large range of
negative effects for the individual and for society; venereal deceases, sterility, astronomic
costs to society, drug abuse, high suicide rates. These plagues, which in part is a direct
result of the Marxists successful deconstruction of the Church and its authority costs the
Western European countries two to three times as much as our military budgets –
possibly significantly more.
And how many millions are either dead or have become zombies (drug addicts) as a
result of the Marxist war against God and the Church? Some would say thousands, but I
would claim that it is millions. An extreme Marxist or egalitarian society has a tendency
to treat individuals as clients (a process known as clientification) instead of producing
independent “winners”. This is apparent in especially Western Europe but not so much so
in the US.
The book “Prozak Nation” illustrates quite well that the cultural Marxist model is failing
miserably and is leading to millions of people with psychological problems and tens of
thousands of suicides. Instead of propagating clear goals for our civilization with specific
obligations to the citizen there is no official recommended course of action for our
existence. This clear civilizational vision must be re-established as an alternative to
meaningless and limitless consumerism which has no other purpose for individuals than
feeding their own ego. Excessive consumerism, drug abuse and sex abuse can never
satisfy the peoples longing for believing in something greater than simply living to feed
their own ego. Whether this vacuum is filled by nationalist principles; pride in your nation
and people – a common enemy: the Ummah, or through the Church, the solutions lie
within conservative principles and values. We must re-affirm our intentions of
commitment against global Jihad, until our own and our allies borders are secured. The
only pragmatical approach to this is mass-deportations because the only other alternative
Europe is now a third world country in regards to spirituality and civilizational goals. We
need to bring back a crystal clear vision and goal for our existence whether it is a formal
embracing of research and development, nationalist principles or the former intertwined
with spirituality under a permanent Christian cultural framework.
And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was death,
and Hell followed with him.
Documents you may be interested
Documents you may be interested