rational creatures we will go to great lengths to prevent our own demise and secure our
Q: What political denominations/groups will eventually flag support for the
European nationalist/cultural conservative groups?
A: Nationalists or anti-internationalists adhere to many ideological denominations. In
essence, all patriots (by the true definition if its meaning) are nationalists but not all
traditionalists are necessarily nationalistic (f example some Christian fundamentalists and
ethnocentric groups). The word “nationalist” has been tainted by history so I prefer the
word “cultural conservative”. Cultural conservatism has obviously nothing to do with
Toryism (traditional conservatism) but rather from the words true meaning: to conserve.
A majority of Tories and Republicans are no longer “conservatives” as they support
You will find most political denominations on our side varying from the apolitical
moderate patriotic and freedom loving European to more extreme factions:
Patriotic liberalists-libertarians-capitalists-socialists-social democrats, Christian agnostics-
atheists-fundamentalists, any anti-internationalist conservative, liberal/progressive,
conservative Hindus-Jews-Buddhists, anti-authoritarians, anti-racists, racists, anti-
fascists/fascists, traditionalists and even some national socialists and nationalist
Bolsheviks. I find it quite ironic that an increasing number of anti-internationalist Marxists
join our side. We also see some Muslims convert to Christianity and begin to support our
The ongoing cultural war will polarise societies and countries further and there will be two
main factions. The nationalists/conservatives (cultural conservatives) vs. the
internationalists (Marxist internationalists, suicidal humanists and capitalist globalists).
The apolitical career cynisists will follow anyone in charge. Our biggest strength (despite
of seemingly overwhelming odds at the moment) is that we have approximately 13
million nationalists spread across Europe willing to die for the cause while only a fraction
is willing to die for “internationalism”. Of course, the internationalists may eventually
attempt to arm the Muslims in Western Europe but if it comes to that they have already
lost. They will lose the support of all remaining non-Muslims and will be left with only a
hardcore Marxist elite with a significantly reduces loyalist/Muslim police/military force. At
this point in time, a majority of the former police force/military will fight by our side.
At the moment, approximately 60% of Europeans (excluding Muslims) support our
fundamental political doctrines but obviously not necessarily the means. However, the
most important distinction here is the male/female ratio of our sympathisers.
Approximately 70% of European males support our cause while only 30% of European
women. As a consequence, when this is all over we must significantly reduce these
women’s influence on political issues relating to national security, social structures, penal
policies, border control, immigration, assimilation, certain cultural issues – national
cohesion and procreation (birth) policies. This is perhaps the most important lesson we
must learn, the betrayal by so many of our own women. It is not really a betrayal as a
majority of our women only thinks and acts in accordance with how nature created them
– in a suicidal compassionate manner. But it is essential that we prevent our women from
propagating their suicidal compassion in “safe and more controlled environments” in the
future. Sure, this is sexist policies but nature itself is sexist and you cannot defy primary
natural laws. This rule will not be without exceptions though and we should keep in mind
that 30% of European women do support us.
Q: If your National government had been very restrictive in regards to
conserving identity, culture and halted Islamic immigration completely would
you still have engaged in operations against them?
A: If my country was on the forefront for ”delaying” Islamisation it would obviously be
counter-productive to launch attacks against that particular regime first. Norway is
perhaps the most suicidal of all Western European countries today. We are on the
forefront in the propagation of ”self-annihilation” policies such as dialogue and
appeasement toward Islam. The country has also created a tradition to use the Nobel
Peace Prize as a tool for Islamic appeasement efforts. I have no moral reservations
whatsoever against participating or leading military operations against Norwegian
Category A and B traitors as it is the most basic of human rights to defend your people
Denmark, being stricter than many countries, will still be unable to prevent the Islamic
demographic warfare through democratic means but at least they are buying some extra
time by implementing relatively strict rules.
Q: “Racist, Nazi, Fascist, Homophobe, Islamophobe” How do you react to the
“cultural Marxist/multiculturalist” labelling techniques, or psychological
warfare if you will?
A: These are typical EUSSR cultural Marxist/multiculturalist labelling techniques.
According to them, anyone who attempts to criticise multiculturalism are racists,
intolerant bigots, angry, underprivileged males etc.
The thinking seems to be that there are only two versions of Europeans. If you do not
support multiculturalism 100% you are a Nazi. You’re also a fascist pig, a racist, a
homophobe – in other words a sub-human. This attitude betrays an all-pervasive hatred
that demonises absolutely anything Europeans do to protect their dignity, culture and
heritage. Multiculturalism is an anti-European hate ideology. As such, they are the Nazis
of our time, not us.
I consider myself to be an anti-racist, anti-fascist and anti-Nazi. That’s the main reason
why I oppose Cultural Communism/European multiculturalism. THEY are the Nazis, they
are the fascists and they are the racists! I have witnessed much racism in my time but
90% of it has been against Europeans. I have actually never been called a racist, fascist
or Nazi before personally but I know it is the preferable tactic of the cultural
Marxist/multiculturalist establishment to silence the masses.
We are not National Socialists, in fact, we oppose National Socialists.
About the perceived anti-Gay mentality
The multiculturalists WANT us to fit in their pre-defined stereotype. They want us to be
racists, fascist, gay hating individuals because it would make their job so much easier in
their effort to label us as the scum of the earth. The truth of the matter is that I
personally know several gay individuals and have known several gay people during the
years and I don’t have any reservations against them. Why would I care what they do
behind closed doors?
However, I personally do object to the “gay media hysteria” which has been going on in
Western Europe the last two decades. In many cases “alleged victim groups” are
subjected to positive discrimination within politics, media and certain sectors. In those
specific contexts it has become standard policy to discriminate so called “heterosexual
men”. Western European media, especially in the protestant countries are obsessed with
cheering the gay community and other minorities they see as “preferred groups” in their
so called “victim hierarchy”. The glorification of “preferred groups” in the EUSSR “victim
hierarchy” have gone too far. It’s racist and fascist.
Q: Why do you think it has come to this?
A: To quote Fjordman;
“Multiculturalists in Western Europe has gradually become fanatical egalitarian, the fight
against “discrimination” of any kind, the idea that all groups of people should have an equal
share of everything and that it is the state’s responsibility to ensure that this takes place.
Multiculturalists have cultivated a culture of victimhood in the West, where you gain
political power and media attention through your status in the victim hierarchy. In many
ways, this is what Political Correctness is all about. “
Needless to say I couldn’t agree more. The extreme egalitarianism you see in NW Europe
today has developed into a crusade against everything and everyone who does not
conform to the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist world view. According to the Nazis of our
time; the multiculturalists: if you do not support multiculturalism you are considered
human garbage and the persecution of human garbage is allowed and even encouraged.
Q: Why sacrifice your own life for something that might not end up as you
project? And why would you be willing to sacrifice your life for others? Why
don’t you just chose the easy way, live the easy life, conform and enjoy all
benefits of modern society offered under the current regimes?
A: This is exactly what my family and friends have implored me to do for years now.
They have pressured me and I must admit I have been somewhat ridden by guilt in this
regard. At the same time I know what has to be done. I could never ignore the current
situation without doing anything. In this regard I felt I had two choices. Create a large
family (3-5 children) or completely focus on my tasks as a part of the European
resistance movement. I don’t understand why so many people can simply ignore the
current situation without doing anything. How can they look their kids in the eyes in the
future knowing that they have done nothing? How can they even act so suicidal and
continue to vote for political parties who support multiculturalism? Their children are the
ones who will have to fight in the coming civil war against the Islamist/cultural Marxist
alliance. They will ask their parents; “why didn’t you do anything, how could you allow
this to happen?” They are the ones who have to fight and perhaps die in Phase 3 because
my generation (and my parents generation) didn’t have the guts to stop the current
development. It’s not right. I feel a strong obligation to contribute in Phase 1 even if I
succumb in the process. It is essential that as many individuals as possible contribute
even if it just results in creating a small crack in the discriminating and genocidal
multiculturalist system. Every effort counts, even the smallest contribution!
“It is better to live one day as a lion, then one hundred years as a sheep.”
Most of the people I know are either cowards or apathetic hypocrites. They know exactly
what is going on but many of them don’t care at all, because they know that they will be
dead before phase 3. I don’t want to judge them too harshly considering the fact that I
used to be an apathetic hypocrite myself. After all, we are all victims in a way as we have
been indoctrinated for decades by the multiculturalist system. However, everyone living
near a capital or a major European city is witnessing the current developments. They
don’t care because it doesn’t concern them yet. Standing up for their beliefs will involve
suffering. They are deliberately avoiding that for as long as possible.
It has always been very tempting to just go with the flow, sticking your head in the sand
and deal with problems as they arise. Having passed the age of 30, I’m now in a situation
where I have to decide whether I want to get married and start a family. I can choose to
live a normal life if I want to, just like my friends are doing. Get a cute girlfriend, get
married, have kids, continue my career and earn 50 000-60 000+ Euro per year. The
problem as I see it is that I truly fear for the future of Europe. How can I procreate
knowing that we are heading for cultural suicide? By being a silent bystander to this I will
be as guilty as our corrupt elites. How could I silently watch while Islamic demographic
warfare is being waged against our societies, diminishing our numbers and the influence
over our very own lives? I feel compelled to act, even though I know that very few will
dare to become one of the pioneers, one of the first martyrs in Phase 1. There are only
two logical steps for people my age; have as many children as possible and prepare for
Phase 2 or 3 or fight now in Phase 1. I chose the latter.
As for the general public; people don’t care as long as their loved ones are safe. They
have careers with solid salaries; they enjoy all the current freedoms. Why on earth would
they give up on all that and join a resistance movement? Joining an anti-Jihad movement
means becoming a political dissident. The government and media will attempt to label
you as a racist or an intolerant bigot and use any means necessary to undermine your
efforts, you risk losing your job, you risk losing everything. The core question is, why
chose the hard way, when you have the option of choosing the easy way? Why chose to
suffer when you do not have to?
There are good men and there are individuals who don’t care at all. The person who has
nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own
personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and
kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.
I chose selflessness, to resist a tyrant oppressor by all means necessary. I couldn’t live
my life as a cowardly hypocrite, sticking my head in the sand.
Q: What’s your view on moderate anti-immigration parties?
A: Their motives are noble although counter-productive. Anti-immigration parties usually
start out as idealistic but end up as a diluted and corrupt verion of their former selves. It
would be better if they admitted the truth, that the democratic struggle to save Europe
has been lost and the only way to proceed is by resisting the establishment by other
means. In many ways, they are contributing to pacify the people by giving them false
Even if they are included as a partner in a future government their policies will end up
being too diluted to make any difference. You cannot become the government unless you
bow to the views of the ”Centre-Left” media elite, especially the broadcast media elite.
They will never get more than 35% of the votes in any election, even in phase 2. As
such, they may be able to delay a Muslim majority by a couple of decades with strict
integration and immigration policies but they will still be unable to prevent the eventual
Q: Can significant indirect damage against civilians be justified?
A: Yes and no. It can be justified in the sense that it is the only pragmatical way to move
forward. When someone blows up a government building it is obviously not with the
intention to kill the cleaning lady or the janitor. The target has been selected after careful
consideration because it will yield the wanted results.
There are extreme and moderate forces. We are all cultural conservatives even though
we use different means. We have taken it upon ourselves to use brute, cynical force so
other people don’t have to. The other political fronts should welcome it as a necessary
evil in order to rid ourselves of a much greater evil.
Innocent people will die, in the thousands. But it is still better than the alternative;
millions of dead Europeans, which is the worst case phase 3 scenario.
Q: What about atheists and Odinists, can they join the PCCTS, Knights Templar?
A: If you want to fight for the cross and die under the “cross of the martyrs” it’s required
that you are a practising Christian, a Christian agnostic or a Christian atheist (cultural
Christian). The cultural factors are more important than your personal relationship with
God, Jesus or the holy spirit. Even Odinists can fight with us or by our side as brothers in
this fight as long as they accept the founding principles of PCCTS, Knights Templar and
agree to fight under the cross of the martyrs. The essence of our struggle is to defeat the
cultural Marxist/multiculturalist regimes of Western Europe before the we are completely
demographically overwhelmed by Muslims.
I have studied Norse Mythology and have a lot of respect for the Odinist traditions. I
consider myself to be a Christian, but Odinism is still and will always be an important part
of my culture and identity.
Q: Is it likely that Odinists will support the cause of the PCCTS, Knights
Templar, considering the fact that many of them hate Christendom?
A: First of all, as a Norwegian, I am extremely proud of my Odinistic/Norse heritage as it
is an essential aspect of my culture and my identity. However, things aren’t black and
white. Supporting the Christian cultural heritage does not automatically mean you hate
Odinism or vice versa. There are pragmatical considerations Odinists have to evaluate as
well. Do they really believe the symbolism of Mjöllnir (Thors hammer) has the potential
to unite the Nordic peoples against the forces we are facing? Do they really believe
Odinistic symbolism would be more suitable compared to the uniting force of
Christendom’s symbolism and that of the cross? Anyone with half a brain will know that
Documents you may be interested
Documents you may be interested