A: Assuming of course that you are referring to the Jewish holocaust under Nazi
Germany; no, I have reviewed the evidence, both the evidence presented by the Allied
powers and the anti-holocaust evidence presented by the Axis Powers and neo-Nazi
movements. I don’t find the anti-holocaust evidence credible so I don’t see a reason why
anyone should deny the Jewish holocaust. As far as I have understood; Nazi Germany
didn’t originally want to annihilate the Jews. They were considering deportation but they
didn’t really have any location to deport them to, and they weren’t offered any location
by the allied forces. They didn’t start massacring the Jews until after they realised that
they were losing the war and the window of opportunity was closing fast (after the failed
Russian invasion in1941). I guess, they used the following logic; they felt they had to cut
out what they viewed as a cancer before they lost the war somewhat like many Serbs did
during the Balkan war. They wanted to deport but as their adversaries made that
impossible they chose the only solution (according to their logic). No one should try to
justify genocide, it is a bad thing that cannot or should not be excused. There are always
My problem with holocaust denial however is the European cultural
Marxist/multiculturalist elite’s refusal to acknowledge the Christian, Hindu, Buddhist,
Zoroastrian genocides by the hand of the Islamic Ummah. Islam has systematically
slaughtered more than 300 million people since its creation and this trend is continuing
every year (see the continuation of the Assyrian, Coptic, Maronite, Hindu genocides in
the Middle East). The politically correct elites of the EUSSR/USASSR are the true
holocaust deniers as they refuse to acknowledge current and historical Islamic atrocities.
Furthermore, while I oppose deniers of the Jewish holocaust I realise that the “holocaust
religion” is an extremely destructive force in Europe. Today, European youths are
systematically brainwashed and made into pacifist eunuchs (school classes being bussed
to former concentration camps and taught to reject their culture, pride etc.). Our elites,
backed by the EUSSR/USASSR cultural hegemony, are stripping away any sense of pride
and honor from European youths in a deliberate scheme to feminise/pacify them in order
to prevent future Nazi movements from emerging. The problem here is that we are left
with little to none cultural defenses against any force which would want to conquer us.
This is why the Islamic Ummah have been taken advantage of our lack of cultural
defenses and are currently colonising us, facilitated by our traitorous cultural
The “holocaust religion” has grown into a destructive anti-European monster, which
prevents nationalistic doctrines from emerging. And without nationalistic doctrines,
Europe will wither and die, which we are seeing today. It’s quite ironic that Even Israel
would appear to have become a victim of it. Needless to say, while I am a strong
supporter of Israel and of all patriotic Jews I acknowledge that the anti-European
holocaust religion must be deconstructed, and instead replaced with an anti-Islamic
version. After all we are talking about a disproportion of 6 million killed Jews vs. 300
million massacred Jews/Christians/Hindus/Buddhists/Zoroastrians/Animists.
As of now, the “holocaust religion” is one of the major factors that are making Europe
vulnerable and susceptible for Islamic conquest through demographical warfare.
European cultural conservatives are today faced with the similar scenario that our Serb
brothers were. Yes, we are going to deport every single Muslim from Europe, but we
must do everything in our power to avoid unnecessary bloodshed as it would hurt our
cause and serve as a catalyst to consolidate our adversaries and allow them to justify the
use of unrestricted military power against us. So what if our enemies bomb our roads,
rail ways and boats, making it impossible to deport? If we are prevented from deporting
we must focus on the real issues and not do anything short sighted. If we do not have a
military or political advantage we should focus on preserving and strengthening our
fragile regime instead of risking it all by acting prematurely. In that scenario, we should
wait a few years until more countries join our alliance until the day where we have the
required roads, trucks, railroads and boats (and a sufficient military force to protect
ourselves) in order to start deportations.
Q: Why do you consider National Socialism to be a “dead” ideology?
A: First of all, the reason I’ve made extensive research around the following fields is
because I think it’s time that all Western European NS’s realises the harm they are
causing in regards to right wing consolidation. National Socialism was designed for
Germany after WW1 and it addressed the concerns and needs of the time (according to
them). The ideology was defeated in WW2 but many right wing individuals still refuse to
let it go. By doing so they are effectively undermining CURRENT concerns and needs of
our time. There are currently so many defensive mechanisms in place in Western
European societies against National Socialism that any attempt to resurrect the ideology
will be counter-productive.
The relatively new Anti-Eurabian, Christian cultural conservative stance however is an
ideology specifically designed to resist these defensive mechanisms or “baits” if you will.
The goal of my argumentation is to contribute to remove the last doubts with the
remaining NS’s. Everyone who wants to contribute to save Europe from cultural genocide
should reject National Socialism and instead chose the Anti-Eurabian, Christian cultural
conservative stance. It is a hybrid of various right wing concepts which has the potential
to gain the support of aprox 35% of Europeans.
At the end of the day the goal is all that matters. If you are unable to conform and adapt
to current and modern concepts which has the potential to bring us to power you will
only undermine your own efforts.
It should be noted though that the majority of the individuals who are labelled as NS
today by the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist establishment are not at all NS and very
often opposed to any NS policies. There are, however, NS out there, some are
ideologically confident senior members and many young and “confused” so called neo-
Nazi’s who mimic the older generation NS. This is a huge challenge that must be
Deceitfulness is the most basic concept in warfare and in politics
“War is deceit”
Muhammad himself made this statement more than 1000 years ago. Politics is war. If you
are unable to understand this concept then you have already lost. The Marxists, like the
Muslims, are masters of deception.
The Muslims understand this very well and have institutionalised deceit through the
concept of “al-Taqiyya”. The multiculturalists or cultural Marxists have institutionalised
deceit through advanced concepts. They want to destroy Western Civilisation and the
Multiculturalism is an anti-Western hate ideology aimed at undermining the indigenous
peoples of Europe and destroying European civilisation and culture. However, they have
created an illusion that the ideology is all about tolerance. Multiculturalism has never
been about tolerance. It is an evil ideology bent on an entire culture's eradication.
We have to give both the Muslims and the cultural Marxists credit though. I respect their
ingenuity if anything.
They have systematically ideologically coerced/brainwashed two generations of
Europeans in the attempt to modify people’s social and political philosophy and instilling
certain attitudes or beliefs in a person. The aim has been to affect individual value
systems and subsequent thought-patterns and behaviours. And they have succeeded to a
This has been done by the use of falsified or biased statistics, falsified or biased sources,
biased/unbalanced coverage, labelling opponents as bigots/racists/Nazis - using
propaganda, manipulation and other forms of trickery in order to lay the foundation for a
new society based on multiculturalism and emotionalism/extreme egalitarianism. They
have therefore managed to limit opposition/resistance towards themselves and towards
mass-Muslim immigration/Islamic demographic warfare.
As a result we are under the current Islamic invasion/colonisation. In 1955 there were
less than 50 000 Muslims in Western Europe. Today there are more than 25 million.
What have the NS movement achieved in this period?
Not as much as they could have, they have spent much of their time defending an
already “exposed” ideology that has no popular support whatsoever. An ideology which
started as a “deceitful” ideology but who has been completely exposed for what it is. The
most popular NS party has received a maximum of 5% support in any election the last 50
years. I can’t really find the words to describe how counter-productive the NS ideology is
in today’s society. It serves as the primary catalyst and reason why multiculturalism has
been so successful.
I’m going to try to cover many aspects of NS in order to describe why I think the current
NS’s should reject this ideology and support the new Western European right wing
movement (pro-Jewish, anti-Islamic stance).
There are many flaws with the European free market system but I still think that our
current version is better than all other economic systems. Of course, there’s a great
difference between the US and EU system (even a great variety between the different
European models), I tend to favour a middle way, a compromise between the US version
and the average EU system. The British system has proven to be sustainable compared
to more socialist oriented variants.
There are only 1 million Jews in Western Europe (800 000 of them in France and the UK)
while there are 5-6 million in the US. So naturally, the American NS movement is much
more obsessed with the Jews than Europeans are. The Jews influence in EU policymaking
is marginal but several right wing groups continue with this obsession regardless. As a
comparison there are 25 million Muslims in Western Europe, up from 50 000 in 1955.
This factor alone proves that the NS ideology is irrelevant and completely outdated in
today’s society. However, the National Socialist still claim that these 200 000 Jews (in
Western Europe with the exception of France and the UK) are in full control of all
governments and are swamping Europe with people of colour (Muslims included) in order
to destroy these three white races (Nordics, Alpines and Mediterranean’s). This
conclusion is incorrect.
Jews in Western Europe
There were slightly more than 1 million Jews living in Western Europe at the start of
2002. Of these, nearly 80 percent could be found in France and the United Kingdom,
home to Europe's largest and strongest Jewish populations.
The number of Jews in France fell from 535 000 in 1980 to some 500 000 in 2002, a loss
of over 6 percent. The Jewish community is in rapid decline due to assimilation,
intermarriage and low birth rates.
British Jewry fared even worse. There were 430 000 Jews living in Great Britain in 1950,
but just 283 000 in 1996.
"French Jewry will experience a slow but steady decline from 520 000 in 2000, to 480
000 in 2020, to 380 000 in 2050, and 300 000 in 2080." "The Jewish population in the
United Kingdom will decline to 240 000 in 2020, 180 000 in 2050, and 140 000 in 2080."
In smaller Jewish communities in Europe, the retrenchment rates have been even more
pronounced; f example in Ireland, where the 1991 census found there to be 1 581 Jews.
Today, the number is said to be approximately 1 000, marking a decline of over 50
percent in just a decade. In Norway there are only approximately 950 Jews and the
number is declining.
Even in countries where the numbers have remained fairly stable, such as Spain or Italy,
or which have experienced growth, such as Germany, it is primarily due to an influx of
immigrants from the former Soviet states, and not because of any inherent vitality within
the local community itself.
So the general tendency in Western Europe is that the Jewish community is rapidly
declining due to assimilation, intermarriage and migration to Israel and the United
So basically, the NS ideology suggests that 950 Jews are controlling the Norwegian
government, a government which is known to be the most anti-Zionist of all European
countries...!? Let’s not forget, 1 000 Jews are controlling Ireland etc. These NS claims are
absolutely ridiculous and counter-productive. Being a Norwegian myself, I know that
these claims are completely false. They have no credibility whatsoever. The reason why
multiculturalism was embraced in Norway and a majority of Western European countries
was because of the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist alliance, an alliance dominated by
indigenous atheist nationals and not Jews. Same can be said regarding claims against the
Freemasons. According to the NS movement the Freemasons are a Zionist organisation.
Being a Free Mason myself I know that this is not only a false claim but actually quite
ridiculous. The Freemasons is not in any way political (I wish the organisation was,
believe me) and it is true that they have a positive view on Jews. However, this is from a
Christian religious context, where solidarity to Jews and Israel is important. The
Freemasons is a Christian only organisation and no Muslim or Jew could become a
member even if they wanted to. There are no political bodies within the organisation
nationally or internationally.
Jews in the world
Most estimates I have seen suggest that there are about 13-14 million Jews in the world.
The vast majority of these Jews live in either the United States or Israel, each with
approximately 5-6 million Jews. There are less than 2 million Jews in Europe combined
(Western Europe totals 1 million), 400 000 in Latin America and 350 000 in Canada. In
Africa, there are less than 100 000 Jews, about 90% of whom live in the country of
South Africa. There are about 100,000 Jews in Australia and New Zealand combined.
There are about 50 000 Jews in Asia (not including Israel).
Jewish upbringing and the capitalistic system
Steven L. Pease writes:
“Jews make up 0.2 percent of the world population, but 54 percent of the world chess
champions, 27 percent of the Nobel physics laureates and 31 percent of the medicine
laureates. Jews make up 2 percent of the U.S. population, but 21 percent of the Ivy League
student bodies, 26 percent of the Kennedy Center honourees, 37 percent of the Academy
Award-winning directors, 38 percent of those on a recent Business Week list of leading
philanthropists, 51 percent of the Pulitzer Prize winners for nonfiction.”
Jews are the single most successful “group of individuals” in the world based on their
numbers (13-14 million only), both economically and within various other fields (Politics,
Science, Literature etc.). Why?
For those familiar with Jewish history knows that they have been persecuted all over the
world the last millennium. They have been targeted in both Muslim and Christian
societies up until the 20
century. These events, in combination with sionist thought,
have contributed to shape the Jewish mentality, principles and upbringing. Jews are
naturally far more paranoid than most people and teach their offspring about valour, the
value of long term goals, the value of saving/investing instead of spending and the value
of the nuclear family and family loyalty. As such, they indoctrinate their children in a
different way than Christian families do. Jews often teach their children to save while
Christian families teach their offspring to spend. In this regard Jewish families tend to
focus on long term goals while the average Christian family is much more short sighted
(Be happy now, you might die tomorrow – credit cards etc.). Obviously this
generalisation has a lot of exceptions and it is gradually being diluted due to gradual
assimilation. From a historical context however, Jewish upbringing compared to Christian
has been influenced by the “minority/majority syndrome”. So the main difference why
Jews are often more successful than Christians (and especially Muslims) are the varieties
in the indoctrination during their upbringing. Some Jews will claim that they have a
higher IQ than Europeans due to biology. However, if this was true then the world IQ
ranking would not indicate that the average IQ for European countries is in fact higher
than that of Israel. The focus on self interest and camaraderie has historically been a
factor which again is linked to historical persecution and other similar factors. This can
also explain why they have survived for so long in “hostile environments” like the Muslim
world and pre-20
Many of the same “Jewish” principles are practised by Christian families though. An
estimated 60-70% of Jews and around 10% of Christians focus on these important
principles which are manifested in their social positions in society.
These principles in upbringing and family orientation are therefore not really limited to
Jews. In Ottoman Turkey, the Christian Armenian minority were equally successful,
handling most of the banking and commerce (until the Muslims wiped them out).
Documents you may be interested
Documents you may be interested