is the teaching of Comparative Religion, which we hope will eventually lead to a lessening
of fanatical fevers, as Islam is seen as but another set of beliefs amongst a host of faiths.
Until Warraq’s recommendations are heeded, we can look forward to an endless jihad.
1. Reuters, “Gunmen hunted "infidel" Westerners” Sun May 30, 2004 06:30 AM ET,
2. i.e., Bernard Lewis, for example, in 1990 http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/90sep/rage.htm
http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/90sep/rage2.htm; November/December 1998 “License to Kill: Usama bin Ladin's Declaration
of Jihad”, Foreign Affairs; 2002 http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/2002/01/lewis.htm; 2003
3. Quoted by J.M. White, in his introduction to, Lane, E.W. An Account of the Manners and Customs of the Modern Egyptians,
New York, 1973, p. v.
4. Lane, E.W. Modern Egyptians, p. 276.
5., 6. Lane, E.W. Modern Egyptians, p. 575.
7. Lane, E.W. Modern Egyptians, pp. 554-555.
8. Fellah. “The Situation of the Jews in Tunis, September 1888.”, Ha-Asif (The Harvest) [Hebrew] 6 (Warsaw, 1889), English
translation in, Bat Ye’or, The Dhimmi- Jews and Christians Under Islam, Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1985, p. 376.
9. Boyce, Mary. A Persian Stronghold of Zoroastrianism (based on the Ratanbai Katrak lectures, 1975), 1977, Oxford.
10. Boyce, M. A Persian Stronghold, p. 139.
11. Boyce, M. A Persian Stronghold, pp. 141-142.
12. Soroudi, Sorour. “The Concept of Jewish Impurity and its Reflection in Persian and Judeo-Persian Traditions” Irano-Judaica
1994, Vol. III, p. 155 (footnote 33):
13. See Tabandeh, Sultanhussein. A Muslim Commentary on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, translated by F.J.
Goulding, London, 1970, pp. 17-19. Tabandeh was a Sufi Shi’ite ideologue whose writings had a profound influence on Ayatollah
Khomeini’s discriminatory policies towards non-Muslims in Iran, as discussed in Sanasarian, Eliz. Religious Minorities in Iran,
Cambridge, 2000, pp. 24-27.
14. Sahih Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 47, Number 786: Narrated Anas bin Malik: “A Jewess brought a poisoned (cooked) sheep
for the Prophet who ate from it. She was brought to the Prophet and he was asked, ‘Shall we kill her?’ He said, ‘No.’ I continued
to see the effect of the poison on the palate of the mouth of Allah's Apostle.”
15. Sanasarian, E. Religious Minorities in Iran, p. 111.
16. Stalinsky, Steven. “Preliminary Overview. - Saudi Arabia's Education System: Curriculum, Spreading Saudi Education to the
World and the Official Saudi Position on Education Policy,” Middle East Media Research Institute, December 20, 2002.
17. Warraq, Ibn. “A True Islamic Reformation,” FrontPageMagazine.com, May 19, 2003
2.39 The ongoing Civil War in Europe – Muslims want autonomous territory, not
From the desk of The Brussels Journal, 10.2006
Radical Muslims in several of France’s local communities are waging an undeclared
“intifada” against the police, with violent clashes injuring an average of 14 officers each
day. As the interior ministry said that nearly 2,500 officers had been wounded this year, a
police union declared that its members were “in a state of civil war” with Muslims in the
most depressed “banlieue” estates which are heavily populated by unemployed youths of
north African origin.
It said the situation was so grave that it had asked the government to provide police with
armoured cars to protect officers in the estates, which are becoming no-go zones. The
number of attacks has risen by a third in two years. Police representatives told the
newspaper Le Figaro that the “taboo” of attacking officers on patrol has been broken
[also in the Netherlands].
[...] [Michel Thoomis, the secretary general of the Action Police trade union,] said
yesterday: “We are in a state of civil war, orchestrated by radical Islamists. This is not a
question of urban violence any more, it is an intifada, with stones and Molotov cocktails.
You no longer see two or three youths confronting police, you see whole tower blocks
emptying into the streets to set their ‘comrades’ free when they are arrested.”
[...] However, Gerard Demarcq, of the largest police unions, Alliance, dismissed talk of
an “intifada” as representing the views of only a minority. Mr Demarcq said that the
increased attacks on officers were proof that the policy of “retaking territory” from
criminal gangs was working.
A quote from Paul Belien at The Brussels Journal, 6 November 2005:
To understand what is going on one cannot look at today’s events from a Western
perspective. One has to think like the “youths” in order to understand them. Not imagine
oneself in their shoes, but imagine their minds in one’s own head. The important
question is: how do these insurgents perceive their relationship with society in France?
Unlike their fathers, who came to France from
Muslim countries, accepting that, whilst remaining
Muslims themselves, they had come to live in a
non-Muslim country, the rioters see France as
their country. They were born here. This land is
their land. And since they are Muslims, this land,
or at least a part of it, is Muslim as well. [...] West
Europeans cannot blame the Muslim “youths” for
looking at the world the way they do. Europe
willingly opened the door to the Muslims, not just
by allowing g large-scale e immigration on n an
unprecedented level, but also by encouraging the
newcomers to retain their culture.
[...] Those media that tell us that the rioting “youths” want to be a part of our society
and feel left out of it, are misrepresenting the facts. As the insurgents see it, they are not
a part of our society and they want us to keep out of theirs. The violence in France is in
no way comparable with that of the blacks in the U.S. in the 1960s. The Paris
correspondent of The New York Times who writes that this a “variant of the same
problem” is either lying or does not know what he is talking about. The violence in France
is of the type one finds when one group wants to assert its authority and drive the others
out of its territory. [...] The Muslims resent the outsiders paternalising them and
interfering with their way of life in the suburbs of all Western Europe’s major cities. Their
message is: get out of our way, get out of our territory, and: you act like you think you’re
the boss but we’ll show you who really is.
A quote from Paul Belien in The American Conservative, 5 December 2005:
It is easy to understand why the “youths” in the suburbs turned so violent when [French
Interior Minister] Sarkozy tried to establish law and order there. The “youths” have held
sway there, unchallenged, for decades. If they allow the French authorities to reassert
their authority, they lose their own power base. Unlike the Western intellectuals, they
realise that everything boils down to the question of who wields power over a specific
territory. The police and the gangs fight over whose laws will apply in the neighbourhood:
the laws of the French Republic or the laws of Eurabia.
[...] Sarkozy, who deployed only policemen in his war, was unable to prevail because he
did not have the weapons to win a territorial conflict. After two days of rioting, police
officers warned that they did not have the means to win what they (correctly) described
as a “civil war.” [...] The poor natives who live in the immigrants’ neighbourhoods know
better, however. They know that the generals of Eurabia, the leaders of the “youths,”
drive BMWs and Mercedes (which no-one dares to set alight), and that they use mobile
phones and PCs to instruct their highly mobile troops. The war in France is not about
social injustice, but about territory.
2.40 Muslim atrocities committed against Western Europeans 1960-2010
The following report includes Muslim atrocities committed against
indigenous Europeans from 1960-2010. It also includes projections to
2020 based on historical numbers. The report includes atrocities such as
murder, indirect murder, rape, gang rape, robberies, beatings, arson and
Total nr. of
The numbers provided have been calculated based on Norwegian, Swedish, British and
French statistics (many of these reports are included in this compendium). There may be
certain errors for certain years. However, the total numbers should be representative for
Western European countries seen as a whole. The numbers may appear astronomical and
it might be hard to believe at first glance. Nevertheless, the numbers are in fact
conservative estimates and the real numbers may be a lot higher.
1. (Be/Ro) Includes Muslim physical and psychological abuse (beatings threats,
harassment, all forms of violence), torture, slavery or financial and/or sexual exploitation
(rape excluded). Estimates are calculated based on number of atrocities committed.
Many Europeans have been abused or exploited several times. Ratio is an average 1000
atrocities per 100 000 Muslims annually.
2. Estimates are calculated based on number of rapes. A gang rape will count number of
rapists in relation to number of rapes. Many European girls/women have been raped
multiple times. Ratio is an average 200 rapes per 100 000 Muslims annually.
3. Estimates include car burnings which is a significant problem in many European major
cities. Arson is often the preferred method the Muslims will use to weaken the society.
Ratio is an average 100 arson attacks per 100 000 Muslims annually.
4. This includes the direct and indirect murder of Europeans committed by Muslims living
in Europe. There us an average of 10 murders per year, per 100 000 Muslims. Ratio is an
average 10 murders per 100 000 Muslims annually.
Wherever there is a presence of Muslims, Islamisation occurs
The ubiquity of the intrusive security measures in our society, security measures
necessary for one reason and one reason only; to defend us from Islamic criminals and
terrorists who are here only because Muslims are here. This is the proof that by the very
fact of admitting large numbers of Muslims into our society, we have already lost our
freedom to the power and the threat of Islam. And, again, no one ever points out this
screamingly obvious fact. No one ever says: the reason we now live in a bunkered
society is that Muslims are among us. If the Muslims hadn't been allowed to come here,
these suffocating security measures would never have been necessary; if the Muslims
weren't here, the security measures would instantly become unnecessary.
These Muslim perpetrators view Europe as “dar-al-Harb” (house of war), as taught in the
Quran. As such, the exploitation and pillaging of European resources and people is the
divine right of all Muslims. A kafr/infidel is an individual regarded as human garbage to a
devout Muslim, a second class citizen. The Muslims therefore takes advantage of their
Allah-given prerogative to rape, kill and steal from Europeans as they view this as the
spoils of war.
Make no mistake. These Muslims must be considered as wild animals. Do not blame the
wild animals but rather the multiculturalist category A and B traitors who allowed these
animals to enter our lands, and continue to facilitate them. This is nothing less than a
genocide aided and abetted by our own elites, primarily Marxist, suicidal humanist and
capitalist globalist politicians and journalists. They will eventually pay the ultimate price
for their war crimes. Judgment day is coming closer for each and every category A and B
traitor. No mercy will be shown to them because they know what they have done and
continue to do.
2.41 Various forms of Jihad
Islamists cannot wage all out war on Europe and expect to win. But they have a religious
duty to try to wage Jihad in some way and eventually conquer all countries. There are
more devious ways to conquer than straightforward war, however. As you can see, many
of these things are already being done.
As we all know, Jihad means struggle. It is every Muslims duty to contribute to or
perform Jihad in one way or the other.
Political/Democratic/Apologistic Jihad (Rhetorical/psychological warfare)
Thousands of active Islamic apologetics on all arenas (ranging from internet forums to
the public debate elsewhere). Their primary goal is to discredit, pacify and silence all
whom criticise Islam and Demographic Jihad.
1. Terminate European freedom of speech by replacing it with hate-crime bills.
2. Wage a war of words using charismatic individuals who directly or indirectly promote
and defend Islam.
3. Engage the European public in dialogues, discussions, and debates in colleges,
universities, public libraries, radio, TV, churches and mosques on the virtues of Islam.
Proclaim how it is historically another peaceful religion like Judaism and Christianity with
the same monotheistic faith.
4. Nominate Muslim sympathisers to political office to bring about favourable legislation
toward Islam and support potential sympathisers by block voting.
5. Take control of as much of the press, TV, radio and the Internet as possible by buying
the related corporations or a controlling stock.
6. Funding European educational institutions for the purpose of manipulating school
7. Yield to the fear of the imminent shut-off of the lifeblood of America – black gold.
Europe’s economy depends on oil and much of it comes from the Middle East.
8. Yell ''foul, out-of-context, personal interpretation, hate crime, Zionist, un- American,
inaccurate interpretation of the Quran (al-Taqiyya)'' anytime Islam is criticised or the
Quran is analyzed in the public arena.
9. Encourage Muslims to penetrate the parliament, specifically with Islamists who can
articulate a marvellous and peaceful picture of Islam. Acquire government positions and
get membership in local school boards. Train Muslims as medical doctors to dominate the
medical field, research and pharmaceutical companies. Establish Middle Eastern
restaurants throughout Europe to connect planners of Islamisation in a discreet way.
10. Provide very sizable monetary Muslim grants to colleges and universities in Europe to
establish ''Centers for Islamic studies'' with Muslim directors to promote Islam in higher-
11. Let the entire world know through propaganda, speeches, seminars, local and
national media that terrorists have hijacked Islam, when in truth, Islam hijacked the
12. Appeal to the historically compassionate and sensitive Westerners for sympathy and
tolerance towards Muslims in the West who are portrayed as mainly immigrants from
13. Form riots and demonstrations in the prison system demanding Islamic Sharia as the
way of life, not the national justice system.
14. Unify the numerous Muslim lobbies in the EU and around Europe, the UN, mosques,
Islamic student centers, educational organisations, magazines and papers by Internet
and an annual convention to coordinate plans, propagate the faith and manipulate news
in the media.
15. Applaud Muslims as loyal citizens of the EU by spotlighting their voting record as the
highest percentage of all minority and ethnic groups in Europe.
16. ”Victimisation” rhetoric as the most potent weapon. This is very obvious in both the
Palestine struggle but was also apparent in Kosovo where they used the Serb-Kosovo
issue with the support of western media to win new territories. Both are clever use of
strategies where victimisation is the key to winning over the media and the sympathy of
humanist organisations and western politicians in general.
Demographic Jihad (Demographic warfare)
What is Islamic demographic warfare (“peaceful” Jihad)? I doubt anyone can explain the
term better than true professionals:
Houari Boumedienne, Algeria’s undisputed ruler until his death in 1978, said it clearly in a
1974 UN speech:
”One day, millions of men will leave the Southern Hemisphere to go to the Northern
Hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends, because they will go there to conquer it.
And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory.”
Libyan Leader Mu'ammar Al-Qadhafi, March, 2007:
There are signs that Allah will grant victory to Islam in Europe without swords, without
guns, without conquest. We don't need terrorists, we don't need homicide bombers. The
50+ million Muslims [in Europe] will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades.
Breed the non-Muslims out, tactic. The most lethal of all tactics as the democratic West is
extremely vulnerable to this form of Jihad. Demographic warfare is in line with
democratic principles which historically have proven to be very successful in tandem with
other forms of Jihad.
Birth control is efficiently prevented through the teachings of the Quran and the Hadith
(Sharia). Furthermore, Sharia ensures that no Muslims are allowed to marry non-Muslims
(without the non-Muslim first converting)
1. Accelerate Islamic demographic growth via:
Massive Muslim immigration. Total number of Muslims in Western Europe is now more
than 25 million, up from 50 000 in 1955 (7,8 million of them living in France, 12% of the
Use no birth control whatsoever – every baby of Muslim parents is automatically a
Muslim and cannot choose another religion later.
2. Muslim men marry European women and Islamises them (Approximately 30,000
annually in Western Europe). Then divorce them and remarry later.
Marriage of a Muslim male with a non-Muslim woman is usually acceptable if she is
Jewish or a Christian. After marriage the male will usually take measures to convert his
wife to Islam. The husband usually push hard to propagate Islam in regards to the
upbringing of their children. The children will be Muslims and are given Muslim/Arabic
names. Violence is usually a part of the picture. If unsuccessful then divorce is the usual
Documents you may be interested
Documents you may be interested