65
194
Gomez-Baggethun, E., Ruiz-Perez, M. (2011) Economic valuation and the commo-
dification of ecosystem services. Progress in Physical Geography 35, 5, 613–28.
Grunewald, K., Bastian, O. (Eds.) (2012) Ökosystemdienstleistungen: Konzept,
Methoden und Fallbeispiele. Springer Spektrum, Berlin.
Hansjürgens, B., Neßhöver, C., Schniewind, I. (2012) Der Nutzen von Ökonomie
und Ökosystemleistungen für die Naturschutzpraxis. Workshop I: Einführung
und Grundlagen. BfN-Skripten 318. Online: http://www.bfn.de/fileadmin/MDB/
documents/service/skript318.pdf (29.04.2014).
Hauck, J., Görg, C., Varjopuro, R., Ratamäki, O., Jax, K. (2013) Benefits and limita-
tions of the ecosystem services concept in environmental policy and decision ma-
king: Some stakeholder perspectives. Environmental Science & Policy 25, 13–21.
Jax, K., Barton, D.N., Chan, K.M.A., de Groot, R., Doyle, U., Eser, U., Görg, C.,
Gómez-Baggethun, E., Griewald, Y., Haber, W., Haines-Young, R., Heink, U., Jahn,
T., Joosten, H., Kerschbaumer, L., Korn, H., Luck, G.W., Matzdorf, B., Muraca, B.,
Neßhöver, C., Norton, B., Ott, K., Potschin, M., Rauschmayer, F., v. Haaren, C.,
Wichmann, S. (2013) Ecosystem services and ethics. Ecological Economics 93,
260–268.
Liu, S., Costanza, R., Farber, S., Troy, A. (2010) Valuing Ecosystem Services: The-
ory, practice, and the need for a transdisciplinary synthesis. Annals of the New
York Academy of Science 1158, 54–78.
Matzdorf, B., Meyer, C. (2014) The relevance of the ecosystem services framework
for developed countries’ environmental policies: A comparative case study of the
US and EU. Land Use Policy 38, 509–521.
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2003) A Framework for Assessment.
Online: http://www.unep.org/maweb/en/index.aspx (29.04.2014).
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005) Ecosystems and Human
Well-Being. Synthesis. Online: http://www.unep.org/maweb/en/index.aspx
(29.4.2014).
Naturkapital Deutschland – TEEB DE. Online: http://www.naturkapital-teeb.de/
(29.04.2014).
Plieninger, T., Schleyer, C., Schaich, H., Ohnesorge, B., Gerdes, H., Hernán-
dez-Morcillo, M., Bieling, C. (2012) Mainstreaming ecosystem services through
reformed European agricultural policies. Conservation Letters 5, 4, 281–288.
Below we have listed a few sources and websites that we
recommend for further reading in relation to the issues raised.
I. oN THE SUBJECT oF ECoSySTEM SErVICES
Blanco, E., Razzaque, J. (2009) Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being in
a Globalized World: Assessing the Role of Law. Human Rights Quarterly 31, 3,
692–720.
Boyd, J., Banzhaf, S. (2007) What are ecosystem services? The need for standar-
dized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics 63, 2, 616–626.
Braat, L.C., de Groot, R. (2012) The ecosystem services agenda: bridging the wor-
lds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public
and private policy. Ecosystem Services 1, 1, 4–15.
Costanza, R., D’Arge, R., De Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B. Limburg,
K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Suttonkk, P., Van den Belt,
M. (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature
387, 253–260.
Daily, G. C. (Ed.) ( 1997) Nature’s Services. Societal Dependence on Natural Eco-
systems. Island Press, Washington DC.
De Groot, R. S. (1987) Environmental functions as a unifying concept for ecology
and economics. The Environmentalist 7, 2, 105–109.
DEFRA (2011) An introductory guide to valuing ecosystem services. DEFRA
(Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs), UK. Online: https://www.
gov.uk/government/publications/an-introductory-guide-to-valuing-ecosystem-
services (29.04.2014).
Ehrlich, P.R., Ehrlich, A.H. (1981) Extinction: the Causes and Consequences of the
Disappearance of Species. Random House, New York.
Fisher, B., Turner, R.K., Morling, P. (2009) Defining and classifying ecosystem
services for decision making. Ecological Economics 68, 3, 643–63.
Gomez-Baggethun, E., de Groot, R., Lomas, P.L., Montes, C. (2010) The history
of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to
markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics 69, 6, 1209–1218.
Links & literature
65
195
Ferraro, P.J. (2008) Asymmetric information and contract design for payments for
environmental services. Ecological Economics 65, 4, 810–821.
Goldman-Benner, R.L., Benitez, S., Calvache, A., Daily, G., Kareiva, P., Kroeger,
T., Ramos, A. (2012) Water funds and payments for ecosystem services: Practice
learns from theory and theory can learn from practice. ORYX 46, 1, 55–63.
Hampicke, U., Arbeitsgruppe Landschaftsökonomie Greifswald (Eds.) (2006)
Anreiz – Ökonomie der Honorierung ökologischer Leistungen. Workshopreihe
„Naturschutz und Ökonomie” Teil 1. BfN-Skripten 179. Online: https://www.bfn.de/
fileadmin/MDB/documents/service/skript179.pdf (29.04.2014).
Hedden-Dunkhorst, B., Lehmann, M., Pascual, U,. Stellmacher, T., Winter, E.,
Berghöfer, A., Blignaut, J., Kronenberg, J., Masiga, M., Todorova, M., Schomers, S.,
Domptail, S., Mumbunan, S., Carius, F., Gundimeda, H. (2010) Payments for Ecosys-
tem Services: Towards their Development and Implementation. BfN, Policy-Brief.
Jack, B.K., C. Kousky, C., Sims, K.R.E. (2008) Designing payments for ecosystem
services: Lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 9465–9470.
Jetzkowitz, J. (2011) Ökosystemleistungen in soziologischer Perspektive. In: Groß,
M. (Ed.) Handbuch Umweltsoziologie, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Kemkes, R.J., Farley, J., Koliba, C.J. (2010) Determining when payments are an
effective policy approach to ecosystem service provision. Ecological Economics 69,
11, 2069–2074.
Koellner, T., Sell, J., Navarro, G. (2010) Why and how much are firms willing to invest
in ecosystem services from tropical forests? A comparison of international and
Costa Rican firms. Ecological Economics 69, 11, 2127–2139.
Matzdorf B., Sattler,C., Engel, S. (2013) Institutional frameworks and governance
structures of PES schemes. Forest Policy and Economics 37, 57–64.
McDermott, M., Mahanty, S., Schreckenberg, K. (2013) Examining equity: A mul-
tidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services.
Environmental Science and Policy 33, 416–427.
Mercer, D.E., Cooley, D., Hamilton, K. (2011) Taking Stock: Payments for Forest
Ecosystem Services in the United States. USDA Forest Service, Nicholas Institute
for Environmental Policy Solutions, Duke University and Forest Trends‘. Ecosystem
Marketplace 1–49.
Rewitzer, S., Matzdorf, B., Trampnau, S. (2014) Das Konzept der Ökosystemleis-
tungen aus Sicht der deutschen Umweltverbände. Natur und Landschaft 89, 2,
61–65.
Schröter-Schlaack, C., Wittmer, H., Mewes, M., Schniewind, I. (Eds.) (2014) Der
Nutzen von Ökonomie und Ökosystemleistungen für die Naturschutzpraxis.
Workshop IV: Landwirtschaft. BfN-Skripten 359. Online: http://www.bfn.de/
fileadmin/MDB/documents/service/skript359.pdf (29.04.2014).
Spangenberg, J.H., Settele, J. (2010) Precisely incorrect. Monetizing the value of
ecosystem services. Ecological Complexity 7, 3, 327–337.
TEEB (2010) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the
Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recom-
mendations of TEEB. Online: http://www.teebweb.org/our-publications/
(29.04.2014).
Wallace, K. J. (2007) Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solu-
tions. Biological Conservation 139, 3, 235–246.
II. oN THE SUBJECT oF PES
Adhikari, B., Boag, G. (2013) Designing payments for ecosystem services sche-
mes: some considerations. Environmental Sustainability 5, 72–77.
Carius, F. (Ed.) (2012) Payments for Ecosystem Services. Towards an Implemen-
tation Strategy. BfN-Skripten 326. Online: http://www.bfn.de/fileadmin/MDB/
documents/service/Skript_326.pdf (29.04.2013).
COM (2007) Green Paper on market-base instruments for environmental and rela-
ted policy purposes. Online: http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/resources/
documents/common/whats_new/com(2007)140_en.pdf (29.4.2014).
Corbera, E., Brown, K., Adger, W.N. (2007) The Equity and Legitimicy of Markets
for Ecosystem Services. Development and Change 38, 4, 587–613.
Engel, S., Pagiola, S., Wunder, S. (2008) Designing payments for environmental
services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues. Ecological Economics
65, 4, 663–674.
Farley, J., Costanza, R. (2010) Payments for ecosystem services: From local to
global. Ecological Economics 69, 11, 2060–2068.
66
196
III. oN SPECIFIC ASPECTS PErTAINING To PES
Design and implementation of PES, practical experience
Arriagada, R., Perrings, C. (2009): Making Payments for Ecosystem Services Work.
UNEP Ecosystem Services Economics Working Papers. Online: http://bioecon-
network.org/pages/UNEP_publications/02%20PES.pdf (29.04.2014).
DEFRA (2013) Payments for Ecosystem Services: A Best Practice Guide. DEFRA
(Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs). Online: https://www.gov.uk/
government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/200920/pb13932-
pes-bestpractice-20130522.pdf (29.4.2014).
The Katoomba Group (2008) Payments for Ecosystem Services: Getting Started. A
Primer. Online: http://www.unep.org/pdf/PaymentsForEcosystemServices_en.pdf
(23.4.2014).
The Katoomba Group (2008) Payments for Ecosystem Services: Market Profiles.
Online: http://ecosystemmarketplace.com/documents/acrobat/PES_Matrix_
Profiles_PROFOR.pdf (29.4.2014).
WWF (World Wildlife Fund) 2006. Ecosystem Services and Payments for Ecosys-
tem Services: Why Should Businesses Care? WWF Forum to Promote Ecosystem
Services and Payments for Ecosystem Services. Online: http://assets.panda.org/
downloads/business_brochure_1.pdf (23.4.2014).
Intermediaries
Coggan, A., Buitelaar, E., Whitten, S., Bennett, J. (2013) Intermediaries in environ-
mental offset markets: Actions and incentives. Land Use Policy 32, 145–154.
Huber-Stearns, H.R., Goldstein, J.H., Duke, E.A. (2013) Intermediary roles and
payments for ecosystem services: A typology and program feasibility application
in Panama. Ecosystem Services 6, 104–116.
Schomers, S., Sattler, C., Matzdorf, B. (2015) An analytical framework for asses-
sing the potential of intermediaries to improve the performance of payments for
ecosystem services. Land Use Policy 42, 58-70.
Property rights
Barzel, Y. (1997) Economic analysis of property rights. Cambridge University Press.
Bromley, D.W. (1991) Environment and economy: property rights and public policy.
Blackwell.
Pascual, U., Muradian, R., Rodriguez, L., Duraiappah, A. (2010) Exploring the link
between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: A concep-
tual approach. Ecological Economics 69, 6, 1237–1244.
Pesche, D., Méral, P., Hrabanski, M., Bonnin, M. (2013) Ecosystem Services and
Payments for Environmental Services: Two Sides of the Same Coin? In: Governing
the provision of Ecosystem Services. Springer Netherlands, 67–86.
Salzman, J. (2005) Creating Markets for Ecosystem Services: Notes from The
Field. New York University Law Review 80, 870–961.
Sattler, C., Matzdorf, B. (2013) PES in a nutshell: From definitions and origins to
PES in practice – approaches, design process and innovative aspects. Ecosystem
Services 6, 2–11.
Sattler, C., Trampnau, S., Schomers, S., Meyer, C., Matzdorf, B. (2013) Multi-clas-
sification of payments for ecosystem services: How do classification charcteri-
stics relate to overall success? Ecosystem Services 6, 31–45.
Schomers, S., Matzdorf, B. (2013) Payments for ecosystem services: A review and
comparison of developing and industrialized countries. Ecosystem Services 6,
16–30.
Tacconi, L. (2012) Redefining payments for environmental services. Ecological
Economics 73, 29–36.
Vatn, A. (2010) An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services.
Ecological Economics 69, 6, 1245–1252.
Vatn, A., Barton, D., Lindhjem, H., Movik, S., Ring, I., Santos, R. (2011) Can Mar-
kets Protect Biodiversity? An Evaluation of Different Financial Mechanisms. Nora-
gric Report No. 60. Online: http://www.umb.no/statisk/noragric/ publications/
reports/2011_nor_rep_60.pdf (29.4.2014).
Wunder, S. (2005) Payments for environmental services: Some nuts and bolts.
Center for International Forestry Research, Occasional Paper No. 42.
Wunder, S. (2013) When payments for environmental services will work for con-
servation. Conservation Letters 6, 4, 230–237.
Wunder, S., Engel, S., Pagiola, S. (2008) Taking stock: A comparative analysis
of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing
countries. Ecological Economics 65, 4, 834–852.
Links & literature
67
197
output-based payments
Bertke, E., Klimek, S., Wittig, B. (2008) Developing result-orientated payment
schemes for environmental services in grasslands: results from two case studies
in North-western Germany. Biodiversity 9, 91–95.
Burton, R.J.F., Schwarz, G.(2013) Result-Oriented Agri-environmental schemes In
Europe and their potential for promoting behavioural change. Land Use Policy 30,
1, 628–641.
Hampicke, U. (2006) Jeder Markt honoriert nicht den Aufwand, sondern das Er-
gebnis. In: Hampicke, U., Arbeitsgruppe Landschaftsökonomie Greifswald (Eds.)
Anreiz – Ökonomie der Honorierung ökologischer Leistungen. Workshopreihe
„Naturschutz und Ökonomie” Teil 1. BfN-Skripten 179, 161–172. Online: https://
www.bfn.de/fileadmin/MDB/documents/service/skript179.pdf (29.04.2014).
Kaiser, T., Rohner, M.-S., Matzdorf, B., Kiesel, J. (2010) Validation of grassland
indicator species selected for result-oriented agri-environmental schemes. Biodi-
versity and Conservation 19, 1297–1314.
Matzdorf, B. (2004) Ergebnis- und maßnahmenorientierte Honorierung ökolo-
gischer Leistungen der Landwirtschaft – Eine Interdisziplinäre Analyse eines
agrarumweltpolitischen Instrumentes. Agrarwirtschaft 179. Agrimedia.
Matzdorf, B., Lorenz, J. (2010) How cost-effective are result-oriented agri-en-
vironmental measures? An empirical analysis in Germany. Land Use Policy 27,
535–544.
Zabel, A,. Holm-Müller, K. (2008) Conservation performance payments for carni-
vore conservation in Sweden. Conservation Biology 22, 247–251.
Acceptance and motivation of service providers
Artner, A., Below, T., Siebert, R., Sieber, S. (2009) Adaptation practices and
their acceptance by rural smallholders: A literature review In: Biophysical and
socio-economic frame conditions for the sustainable management of natural
resources: Tropentag 2009, Hamburg, Germany. Online: http://www.tropentag.
de/2009/abstracts/links/Artner_Gn8JCXz9.pdf (29.04.2014).
Fish, R., Burgess, J., Chilvers, J. Footitt, A., Haines-Young, R. Russel, D., Turner, K.,
Winter, D.M (2011) Participatory and deliberative techniques for embedding an
ecosystems approach into decision making: An introductory guide. Produced for
DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs) No. 0124.
Conning, J., Robinson, J. (2007) Property rights and the political organization of
agriculture. Journal of Development Economics 82, 416–447.
Lockie, S. (2013) Market instruments, ecosystem services, and property rights:
assumptions and conditions for sustained social and ecological benefits. Land
use policy 31, 90–98.
Rodgers, C. (2003) Agenda 2000, Land Use, and the Environment:Towards a
Theory of ‚Environmental‘ Property Rights. Law and Geography 5, 239–259.
Rodgers, C. (2009) Property rights, land use and the rural environment: a case for
reform. Land Use Policy 26, 134–141.
Externalities
Baumol, W.J., Oates, W.E. (1988) The Theory of Environmental Policy. Second
Edition, Cambridge University Press.
Coase, R.H. (1960) The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3,
1–44.
Mankiw, N.G. (2003) Principles of Economics. 3rd International Student Edition.
ITPS Thomson Learning. Chapter 10: Externalities.
Transaction costs
Coggan, A., Buitelaar, E., Whitten, S., Bennett, J. (2013) Factors that influence
transaction costs in development offsets: Who bears what and why? Ecological
Economics 88, 222–231.
Coggan, A., Whitten, S.M., Bennett, J. (2010). Influences of transaction costs in
environmental policy. Ecological Economics 69, 9, 1777–1784.
Falconer, K., Dupraz, P., Whitby, M. (2001) An Investigation of Policy Administrati-
ve Costs Using Panel Data for English Environmentally Sensitive Areas. Journal of
Agricultural Economics 52, 1, 83–103.
Kersten, M. (2008) Transaktionskosten im Naturschutzmanagement. In: Wätzold,
F., Hampicke, U., Arbeitsgruppe Landschaftsökonomie Greifswald: Ökonomi-
sche Effizienz im Naturschutz. Workshopreihe „Naturschutz und Ökonomie“
Teil II. BfN-Skripten 219, 115–130. Online: http://www.bfn.de/fileadmin/MDB/
documents/service/skript219.pdf (29.04.2014).
Mettepenningen, E., Beckmann, V., Eggers, J. (2011) Public transaction costs of
agri-environmental schemes and their determinantes – analyzing stakeholders’
involvement and perceptions. Ecological Economics 70, 4, 641–650.
68
198
Mettepenningen, E., Vandermeulen, V., Delaet, K., Van Huylenbroeck, G., Wailes,
E.J. (2013) Investigating the influence of the institutional organisation of agri-en-
vironmental schemes on scheme adoption. Land Use Policy 33 ,20–30.
Meyer C., Matzdorf B., Müller K., Schleyer C. (2014) Cross Compliance as payment
for public goods? Understanding EU and US agricultural policies. Ecological
Economics 107, 185-194.
Mettepenningen, E., Verspecht, A., Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2009) Measuring
private transaction costs of European agri-environmental schemes. Journal of
Environmental Planning and Managment, 52, 649–667.
Osterburg, B. (2008) Effizienz von Überwachungs‐ und Sanktionsmaßnahmen in
der Agrarumweltpolitik. In: Wätzold, F., Hampicke, U., Arbeitsgruppe Landschaft-
sökonomie Greifswald: Ökonomische Effizienz im Naturschutz. Workshopreihe
„Naturschutz und Ökonomie“ Teil II. BfN-Skripten 219, 131–148. Online:
http://www.bfn.de/fileadmin/MDB/documents/service/skript219.pdf
(29.04.2014).
Plieninger, T., Schleyer, C., Schaich, H., Ohnesorge, B., Hernámdez-Morcillo, M.,
Bieling, C. (2012) Mainstreaming ecosystem services through reformed European
agricultural policies. Conservation Letters, 0, 1–8.
Prager, K., Reed, M., Scott, A. (2012) Encouraging collaboration for the provision
of ecosystem services at a landscape scale – Rethinking agri-environmental
payments. Land Use Policy, 29, 244–249.
Schleyer, C. (2008) Sind regional angepasste Agrarumweltmaßnahmen effizient?
In: Wätzold, F., Hampicke, U., Arbeitsgruppe Landschaftsökonomie Greifswald:
Ökonomische Effizienz im Naturschutz. Workshopreihe „Naturschutz und Öko-
nomie“ Teil II. BfN-Skripten 219, 79–94. Online: http://www.bfn.de/fileadmin/
MDB/documents/service/skript219.pdf (29.04.2014).
Schroeder, L. A., Isselstein, J., Chaplin, S., Peel, S. (2013) Agri-environment
schemes: Farmers acceptance and perception of potential ‘Payment by Results’
in grassland – A case study in England. Land Use Policy, 32:134–144.
Uthes, S., Matzdorf, B. (2013) Studies on agri-environmental measures: A survey
of the literature. Environmental Management 51, 251–266.
Uthes, S., Matzdorf, B., Müller, K., Kaechele, H. (2010) Spatial Targeting of Ag-
ri-Environmental Measures: Cost-Effectiveness and Distributional Consequences.
Environmental Management 46, 3, 494–509.
Frey, B.S., Jegen, R. (2000) Motivation crowding theory. A survey of empirical evi-
dence. Institute for Empirical Research in Economics University of Zurich Working
Paper Series. Working Paper No. 26.
Kosoy, N., Corbera, E., Brown, K. (2008) Participation in payments for ecosys-
tem services: Case studies from Lacandon rainforest in Mexico. Geoforum 39,
2073–2083.
Máñez Costa, M. (2011) A participatory Framework for conservation payments.
Land Use Policy 28, 2, 423–433.
Nicolaus, K., Jetzkowitz, J. (2014) How Does Paying for Ecosystem Services
Contribute to Sustainable Development? Evidence from Case Study Research in
Germany and the UK. Sustainability 6, 5, 3019–3042.
Prager, K., Freese, J. (2009) Stakeholder involvement in agri-environmental policy
making – Learning from a local- and a state-level approach in Germany. Journal of
Environmental Management 90, 2, 1154–1167.
Prager, K., Reed, M., Scott, A. (2012) Encouraging collaboration for the provision
of ecosystem services at a landscape scale – Rethinking agri-environmental
payments. Land Use Policy 29, 1, 244–249.
Siebert, R., Knierim, A., Müller, K. (2005) Zur Akzeptanz von umweltschonender
Landnutzung durch Landwirte. In: Ackerlandschaften: Nachhaltigkeit und Natur-
schutz auf ertragsschwachen Standorten. Springer, Berlin. 89–102.
Stenseke, M. (2009) Local participation in cultural landscape maintenance:
Lessens from Sweden. Land Use Policy 26, 2, 214–223.
Zogrofs, C., Howarth, R.B. (2010) Deliberative Ecological Economics for Sustaina-
bility Governance, Sustainability 2, 11, 3399–3417.
Agri-environmental programs in the European Union and the United States
Baylis, K., Peplow, S., Rausser, G., Simon, L. (2008) Agri-environmental policies in
the EU and United States: A comparison. Ecological Economics 65, 4, 753–764.
Claassen, R., Cattaneo, A., Johansson, R. (2008) Cost-effective design of
agri-environmental payment programs: U.S. experience in theory and practice.
Ecological Economics 65, 4, 737–752.
Dobbs, T. L., Pretty, J. (2008) Case study of agri-environmental payments: The
United Kingdom. Ecological Economics 65, 4, 765–775.
Links & literature
57
199
Models and tools
Babcock, B.A., Lakshminarayan, P.G., Wu, J., Zilberman, D. (1997) Targeting Tools
for the Purchase of Environmental Amenities. Land Economics 73, 325–339.
Chen, X., Lupi, F., An, L., Sheely, R., Vina, A., Liu, J. (2012) Agent-based modeling
of the effects of social norms on enrollment in payments for ecosystem services.
Ecological Modelling 229, 16–24.
Fürst, C., Volk, M., Pietzsch, K., Makeschin, F. (2010) Pimp Your Landscape: A
Tool for Qualitative Evaluation of the Effects of Regional Planning Measures on
Ecosystem Services. Environmental Management 46, 6, 953–968.
Johst, K., Drechsler, M., Wätzold, F., Ulbrich, K., Ohl, C., Settele, J. (2008) Wie
berechnet man ökonomisch effiziente Kompensationszahlungen für Artenschutz-
maßnahmen? Eine softwarebasierte Entscheidungshilfe auf Grundlage eines
ökologisch‐ökonomischen Modells. In: Wätzold, F., Hampicke, U., Arbeitsgrup-
pe Landschaftsökonomie Greifswald: Ökonomische Effizienz im Naturschutz.
Workshopreihe „Naturschutz und Ökonomie“ Teil II. BfN-Skripten 219, 49–66.
Online: http://www.bfn.de/fileadmin/MDB/documents/service/skript219.pdf
(29.04.2014).
Layton, D.F., Siikamäki, J. (2009) Payments for Ecosystem Services Programs:
Predicting Landowner Enrollment and Opportunity Cost Using a Beta-Bionomial
Model. Environmental Resource Economics 44, 415–439.
Sun, Z., Müller, D. (2013) A framework for modelling payments for ecosystem ser-
vices with agent-based models, Bayesian belief networks and opinion dynamics
models. Environmental Monitoring and Software 45, 15–28.
Vigerstol, K.L., Aukema, J.E. (2011) A Comparison of Tools for Modeling Fres-
hwater Ecosystem Services. Journal of Environmental Management 92, 10,
2403–2409.
Wünscher, T., Engel, S., Wunder, S. (2008) Spatial Targeting Of Payments For
Environmental Services: A Tool Boosting Conservation Benefits. Ecological Eco-
nomics 65, 4, 822–833.
Conservation banking, mitigation banking and Eingriff-Ausgleichsregelung
Carroll, N., Fox, J., Bayon, R (eds) (2008) Conservation and Biodiverstiy Ban-
king: A Guide to Setting Up and Running Biodiversity Credit Trading Systems.
Earthscan UK & USA.
Conway, M., Rayment, M., White, A., Berman, S. (2013) Exploring potential
demand for and supply of habitat banking in the EU and appropriate design
elements for a habitat banking scheme. Final Report submitted to DG Environ-
ment. Online: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/enveco/taxation/pdf/Habitat_
banking_Report.pdf (29.04.2014).
Hallwood, P. (2007) Contractual difficulties in environmental management: The
case of wetland mitigation banking. Ecological Economics 63, 2/3, 446–451.
Litterski, B., Hampicke, U., Czybulka, D. (2008) Produktionsintegrierte Kom-
pensationsmaßnahmen. Rechtliche Möglichkeiten, Akzeptanz, Effizienz und
naturschutzgerechte Nutzung. In: Wätzold, F., Hampicke, U., Arbeitsgruppe
Landschaftsökonomie Greifswald: Ökonomische Effizienz im Naturschutz.
Workshopreihe „Naturschutz und Ökonomie“ Teil II. BfN-Skripten 219, 19–32.
Online: http://www.bfn.de/fileadmin/MDB/documents/service/skript219.pdf
(29.04.2014).
Macke, S. (2009) Marktorientierung im Naturschutz. Institutionenökonomische
Analyse von Ausgleichsmechanismen in der Eingriffsregelung in Deutschland und
den USA. Cuvillier, Göttingen.
Robertson M.M. (2004) The neoliberalisation of ecosystem services: wetland
mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance. Geoforum 35, 3,
361–373.
Ruhl, J.B., Salzmann, J., Goodman, I. (2009) Implementing the New Ecosystem
Services Mandate of the Section 404 Compensatory Mitigation Program: A Cata-
lyst for Advancing Science and Policy. Stetson Law Review, Vol. 38.
72
200
Westcountry Rivers Trust (2013) Water Quality. Catchment Management
Evidence Review. Online: http://de.slideshare.net/NickWRT/upstream- thinking-
catchment-management-evidence-review-water-quality/ (14.01.14).
MoorFutures®
Der MoorFutures-Standard. Online: http://www.moorfutures.de/sites/
default/files/redaktion/Fotos%20W.%20Thiel/Standard%20MoorFutures.pdf
(25.03.2014).
Joosten, H., Brust, K., Couwenberg, J., Gerner, A., Holsten, B., Permien, T., Schäfer,
A., Tanneberger, F., Trepel, M., Wahren, A. (2013) MoorFutures – Integration von
weiteren Ökosystemdienstleistungen einschließlich Biodiversität in Kohlenstoff-
zertifikate – Standard, Methodologie und Übertragbarkeit in andere Regionen.
BfN Skripten 350.
Landesamt für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes
Schleswig-Holstein (Ed.) (2012) Potentiale und Ziele zum Moor- und Klimaschutz:
Gemeinsame Erklärung der Naturschutzbehörden. Eine Vision für Moore in
Deutschland. Online: http://www.schleswig-holstein.de/UmweltLandwirtschaft/
DE/NaturschutzForstJagd/13_Projekte/06_Moorschutz/PDF/Positionspapier__
blob=publicationFile.pdf (25.03.2014).
Ministerium für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz Mecklenburg –
Vorpommern (2010) Investments für Klima- und Naturschutz. Online:
http://www.moorfutures.de/sites/default/files/mf_broschuere_20.10.2010.pdf
(25.03.2014).
Wolters, S., Tänzler, D., Theiler, L., Drösler, M. (2013) Entwicklung von Konzepten
für einen nationalen Klimaschutzfonds zur Renaturierung von Mooren. Umwelt-
bundesamt, Berlin. Online: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/
files/medien/378/publikationen/climate_change_05_2013_gather_renaturie-
rung_von_mooren_barrierefrei.pdf (25.03.2014).
Woodland Carbon Code (WCC)
Forest Carbon. Online: http://www.forestcarbon.co.uk/ (25.03.2014).
The Green insurance company – Carbon offsetting. Online:
http://www.greeninsurancecompany.co.uk/environment/carbonOffset.html
(25.03.2014).
UK Woodland Carbon Code.
Online: http://ww.forestry.gov.uk/forestry/infd-84hl57 (25.03.2014).
Woodland Carbon Code Version 1.2 - Requirements for voluntary carbon sequest-
ration projects. Online: http://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/WoodlandCarbonCode_
Version_1.2.pdf/$FILE/WoodlandCarbonCode_Version_1.2.pdf [14.01.]
Criticism of PES
Kosoy, N., Corbera, E. (2010) Payments for ecosystem services as commodity
fetishism. Ecological Economics 69, 6, 1228–1236.
McAfee, K. (2012) The Contradictory Logic of Global Ecosystem Services Markets.
Development and Change 43, 1, 105–131.
Muradian R., Arsel, M., Pellegrini, L., Adaman, F., Aguilar, B., Agarwal, B., Corbera,
E., Ezzine de Blas, D., Farley, J., Froger, G., Garcia-Frapolli, E., Gómez-Bagget-
hun, E., Gowdy, J., Kosoy, N., Le Coq, J.F., Leroy, P., May, P., Méral, P., Mibielli, P.,
Norgaard, R., Ozkaynak, B., Pascual, U., Pengue, W., Perez, M., Pesche, D., Pirad,
R., Ramos-Martin, J., Rival, L., Saenz, F., Van Hecken, G., Vatn, A., Vira, B., Urama,
K. (2013) Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win-win
solutions. Conservation Letters 6, 4, 274–279.
Muradian R., Corbera, E., Pascual, U., Kosoy, N., May, P.-H. (2010) Reconciling
theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding
payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 69, 1202–1208.
Norgaard, R.B. (2010) Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to com-
plexity blinder. Ecological Economics 69, 6, 1219–1227.
Sullivan, S. (2009) Green capitalism and the cultural poverty of constructing
nature as services-provider. Radical Anthropology 3, 18–27.
Van Hecken, G., Bastiaensen, J. (2010) Payments for ecosystem services: justified
or not? A political view. Environmental Science and Policy 13, 785–792.
IV. FUrTHEr rEADING oN oUr CASE STUDIES
➜ Voluntary non-governmental payments
Upstream Thinking with Westcountry rivers Trust
OECD (2013) Providing agri-Environmental public goods through collective action
(COM/TAD/CA/ENV/EPOC(2012)11/REV2), Section 17. Online:
http://www.southwestwater.co.uk/media/pdf/d/n/OECD_report_on_providing_
agri-environmental_public_goods_through_collective_action.pdf (25.03.2014).
South West Water. Online:
http://www.southwestwater.co.uk/index.cfm?articleid=8329 (25.03.2014).
Welters, R., Day, B. (2012) Fowey River Improvement Auction. Online: http://
www.cserge.ac.uk/research/current-projects/fowey-river-improvement-auction
(25.03.2014).
Links & literature
73
201
MacCormack, J. (2010) San Antonio voters embrace conservation. TLCVEF Express
News. Online: http://www.tlcvef.org/2010/11/san-antonio-voters-embrace-
conservation-pass-measure-to-protect-edwards-aquifer-and-build-parks-and-
trails/ (25.03.2014).
Pumlumon Project
Wildlife Trusts Wales, care of Montgomeryshire Wildlife Trust (n.d.) Invest in the
Pumlumon Project. Carbon store. Water tank. Wildlife haven. Online:
http://www.montwt.co.uk/images/user/Pum_brochure.pdf (25.03.2014).
Wildlife Trusts Wales, care of Montgomeryshire Wildlife Trust (2010) The Pumlu-
mon Project. A Landscape for Life. Two Year Progress Report 2008 – 2010. Online:
http://www.montwt.co.uk/images/user/Pumlumon%20progress%20report%20
2010.pdf (25.03.2014).
Wynne-Jones, S. (2012) Negotiating neoliberalism Conservationists role in the
development of PES. Geoforum 43, 6, 1035–1045.
➜ VoLUNTAry GoVErNMENTAL PAyMENTS
Naturschutzgerechte Bewirtschaftung von Grünland in der nordrhein-
westfälischen Eifel
Dachverband Biologische Stationen Nordrhein-Westfalen. Online:
http://www.biostationen-nrw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=
article&id=49&Itemid=55&lang=de (25.03.02014).
Hermeling, S., Thelen, H-W., Schmitz, M. (2011) Integration artenreicher Wiesen
und Weiden in der Eifel in heutige Milchviebetriebe. Vom Pilotprojekt 1985 bis
zum Kulturlandschaftsprogramm NRW: Erfahrungen und Erkenntnisse aus 25
Jahren. Online: http://www.bfn.de/fileadmin/MDB/documents/ina/vortraege/
2011/2011-Gruenland-Hermeling.pdf (25.03.2014).
Schumacher, W. (2007) Bilanz – 20 Jahre Vertragsnaturschutz. Vom Pilotprojekt
zum Kulturlandschaftsprogramm NRW. Naturschutz-Mitteilungen 1/07. Online:
http://www.lanuv.nrw.de/veroeffentlichungen/namit/namit200701/nn_1-07_
s21s28.pdf (9.10.2013).
Schumacher, W. (2010) Wiesen, Weiden und Magerrasen der Mittelgebirge
am Beispiel der Eifel. Online: http://www.agrarforschung.de/download/13_
Schumacher.pdf (23.4.2014).
Schumacher, W. (2012) Entwicklung, Erfolge und Perspektiven des Vertragsnatur-
schutzes in Nordrhein-Westfalen. In: Naturschutz in NRW, Band 10, S. 61–72.
Trinkwasserwald
®
e.V.
Anders, S., Müller, J., Augustin, S., Rust, S. (2006) Die Ressource Wasser im zwei-
schichtigen Nadel-Laub-Mischbestand. In: Fritz, P. (Ed.) Ökologischer Waldumbau
in Deutschland – Fragen, Antworten, Perspektiven. oekom, München: 152–183.
* Rust, S. (n.d.) Auszug aus der Expertise „Waldstruktur und Wasserhaushalt
(verfasst für Trinkwasserwald® e.V.). Online: http://www.trinkwasserwald.de/
de/aktuelles/presse/downloadbereich.php (25.11.2013).
Trinkwasserwald® e.V. Erläuterung der Werte zur CO2-Reduktion. Online:
http://www.trinkwasserwald.de/media/pdf/Werte_CO2_Kompensation.pdf
(25.03.2014).
Trinkwasserwald
®
e.V. Vereinsprofil. Online: http://www.trinkwasserwald.de/
media/pdf/PR_Basisinfo_Trinkwasserwald.pdf (25.03.2014).
Westcountry Angling Passport
The Westcountry Angling Passport Scheme. Confluence: the Journal of the West-
country Rivers Trust, Issue 10: August 2009, 6–7. Online: http://www.wrt.org.uk/
confluence/autumn_09.pdf (25.03.2014).
Blühendes Steinburg
Groth, M. (2005) Ein institutionenökonomisch fundiertes Pilotprojekt zur
ergebnisorientierten Honorierung ökologischer Leistungen. In: Jahrbuch der
Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Agrarökonomie, Band 14, S. 175–185. Online:
www.boku.as.at/oega (28.3.2014).
Groth, M. (2008) Kosteneffizienter und effektiver Biodiversitätsschutz durch
Ausschreibungen und eine ergebnisorientierte Honorierung: Das Modelprojekt
„Blühendes Steinburg“. Working Paper No. 105, University of Lüneburg. Online:
http://www.leuphana.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Forschungseinrichtungen/
ifvwl/WorkingPapers/wp_105_Upload.pdf (16.10.2013).
Stiftung Naturschutz Schleswig-Holstein (n.d.) Blühendes Steinburg und PIK.
Online: http://www.sn-sh.de/index.php?id=1112 (23.4.2014).
Edwards Aquifer Protection Program
City of San Antonio – Edwards Aquifer Protection Program (EAPP). Online:
https://www.sanantonio.gov/EdwardsAquifer (25.03.2014).
Hielscher, M. (2000) Grundwasserschutz im Karst. Oberseminar an der TU
Freiberg. Online: http://www.geo.tu-freiberg.de/hydro/oberseminar/pdf/
Mandy%20Hielscher.PDF (25.3.2014).
Documents you may be interested
Documents you may be interested