surveys are easy for respondents to use. This paper provides some basic suggestions for incorporating a
tered design approach into the development of government surveys.
n Wiley & Sons.
ologists. In Dimensions of
. Ulf-Dietrich Reips & Michael Bosnjak (Editors). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers.
e Internet. Draft
for the CPI. Proceedings of
sting program. New
Architect. Available at http://www.newarchitectmag.com/documents/s=7457/na0802b/index.html.
vidence from the
lsevier Science Publishers, 757-789.
erican Community Survey.”
nce of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Montreal, Canada,
d Design into CAI Development.
ent, Evaluation, and Testing Methods
Badre, A.N. (2002). Shaping Web Usability: Interaction Design in Context. New York: A
Boehm, B. (1988). A spiral model of software development and enhancement. IEEE Computer, 2
illman, D.A. (2000). Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (second ed.). Joh
illman, D.A., and Bowker, D.K. (2001). The Web Questionnaire Challenge to Survey Method
Dillman, D.A., Phelps, G., Tortora, R., Swift, K., Kohrell, J., and Berck, J. (in press). Response Rate
Differences in Mixed Mode Surveys: Using Mail, Telephone, Interactive Voice Response, and th
document available at
Fox, J.E. (2001). Usability methods for designing a computer-assisted data collection instrument
the FCSM Conference, Washington, D.C.
Fraser, J. (2002). The culture of usability: How to spend less and get more from your usability-te
ricker, R.D., and Schonlau, M. (2002). Advantages and disadvantages of Internet research surveys: E
literature. RAND document, available at http://www.schon
Gould, J.D. (1988). How to design usable systems. In Helander, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Hum
Griffin, D.H., Fischer, D.P., and Morgan, M.T. (2001). Testing an internet option for the Am
Paper presented at the Annual Confere
also available at http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/ACS/Paper29.pdf.
Mockovak, W. and Fox, J. (2002). Approaches for Incorporating User-Centere
Proceedings of the International Conference on Questionnaire Developm
(QDET), Charleston, SC.
National Cancer Institute. (2002). Research-Based Web Design and Usability Guidelines. Available
ing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity. Indianapolis: New Riders Publishing.
New Riders Publishing.
.A. and Draper, S.W. (1986). User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Royce, W.W. (1970). Managing the development of large software systems: Concepts and techniques, Proceedings of IEEE
WESTCON, Los Angeles, 1-9.
Schober, M., Conrad, F., Ehlen, P. & Fricker, S. (2003). How Web surveys differ from other kinds of user interfaces. Paper
presented at The 58th Annual Conference of the American Association of Public Opinion Research, Nashville, TN.
Spool, J. Scanlon, T., Snyder, C., DeAngelo, T., Schroeder, W. (1998). Web Site Usability. Morgan Kaufmann
Virzi, R.A. (1992). Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: How many subjects is enough? Human Factors, 42(4),
ielsen, J. (2000). Design
Nielsen, J. (1992). Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation. In CHI ‘92, 373-380.
Nielsen, J. and Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In CHI ‘90, 24
Nielsen, J. and Tahir, M. (2002). Homepage Usability: 50 Websites Deconstructed. Indianapolis: