37
THE URBAN FUTURE 21 – Chapter IV: Rising to the Urban Challenge: Governance and Policy
297
In particular, these plans should specify the areas on which – for good environmental reasons – no
development, formal or informal, should be allowed. To enforce such prohibitions, it may be
necessary for a public authority to acquire the land on which development was to be stopped, at least
temporarily. The key, in the most difficult cases, would be to dispose of the land in such a way that it
could never be developed; for instance, by dividing it into multiple small parcels and giving these
away to members of the community, or to children, who could be expected to defend their tiny rural
plots.
Within such a framework, the general solution would be to accommodate urban growth by
progressively decentralizing it at the broad metropolitan scale while reconcentrating it at the more
local scale. Employment and services should be encouraged by a variety of measures to decentralize
as people move out to new homes on the periphery. To some extent, of course, this will happen
naturally: local services will follow residences, and a little later other activities will migrate outwards
in search of labour supplies and lower land costs. So the market will work with policy, but it may
need encouragement.
The important point is not to permit an indeterminate sprawl, but to plan for decentralization into
local communities of defined size, each with its own employment and services, clearly separated by
green areas for agriculture and recreation, and connected by good quality public transport. Within
these decentralized communities, further, there should be the maximum possible mixture of land uses
subject to avoiding negative externalities (such as air, water or noise pollution). Densities should be
medium-high, based for the most part on single-family homes with gardens on conventional streets,
with occasional higher-density apartment complexes for single younger and older people, generally
clustered close to shops and transport. Decaying and abandoned urban areas should be regenerated,
and slums should be retrofitted with services, as far as possible on the self-help principle with
approporiate assistance to local community groups.
Such a pattern is far from novel. On the contrary: it represents best planning practice from many
countries over the last century, and it corresponds to the latest research about sustainable urban
development. It has been tested and tried. And it fits powerful economic and social trends, expressed
through real estate markets; it aims to bend these trends, not to try to break them, which would be
neither possible nor advisable.
As earlier said, there may be local variations set above all by income, by social custom and by
available resources, including human resources. Even as between developed countries, there are and
will be distinctions in the proportions of houses and flats, in prevailing densities, in the pattern of
service provision, and in the transport network. In the developing world the differences may be even
greater, particularly as between those emerging middle-income countries well embarked on the
development trajectory, and those faced with intractable problems towards the bottom end of the